Member Info for tonynorstrom1

6 months ago the SP was around 25-28p - that’s pre Dubhe 1 flow test. 1 year ago PANR was 70p - that was pre-Megrez which was effectively a duster. The share count was also 200,000,000 less.

Keep it real guys!

Dawesa - a few days ago you were calling for an “educational convo” - how can you be calling a post that’s factually incorrect “positive and great” ? Just trying to keep the “ convo” real !

It’s certainly positive - great I don’t think so. I can think of another word starting with g and ending with ish which would be more apt.

I was about to say the same Stas - a complete nonsensical post.

Maybe to help Mr Siggins get his head around how nonsensical his post is - is he saying that all the stocks he is currently invested in are the only ones he will ever look at ?

Edy - with respect - you said that others don’t understand business implying that you do. That may be the case but there a big difference between flipping burgers and running an oil company - do you understand the Oil Business?

PANR have 1.6B Boed of contingent resources. There are many contingencies but in short you need to be able to demonstrate that the oil can be extracted commercially - that’s where we’re at. - so far PANR have not been able to do that meaning that the oil in the ground is worth very little - so far. And hey - it will stay there’s unless they can make money extracting it.

Siggins- I think I know Stas a little bit better than you - I think he’s both an Investor and trader - I don’t think he has deliberately tried to misrepresent his position or manipulate fellow posters. If the company bull up “substantive news on financing”, “Megrez - 7 independent horizons” and then “Dubhe 1” and fail to deliver on any of them whist at the same time time as watch the SP trickle down to 7p - it’s not unreasonable to “switch sides” is it?

“So many trashing this have no clue about business”

Ok Edy - enlighten us stupid people - tell us what you know about Dubhe 1 and where we’re heading.

James,

Common man - wake up and pull your head out of the sand. Let’s use a bit of logic here - the SP has tanked - many have lost a lot of money and that’s really the clue here. The SP is telling you that progress / results have so far fallen well below expectations - a bit of negativity is to be expected and ok if the posts are grounded in facts. These posts are far preferable in my book than the nonesense you post which typically have little to no substance and are not grounded in fact. Don’t confuse toxicity with a bit of realism.

Cbaron - It sounds like there is much more sensible and interesting discussion on Discord

"The fact is that the tests were put on hold for a reason - we're not told what the reason(s) is(are) and we have to wait until the spring with no promise of any substantive information until then"

This is an interesting comment in itself - on the face of it we have been told the reason - the clean up was taking too long and the high running costs in the heart of winter can be mitigated by delaying further testing until spring.

In the 22nd of Dec 25 RNS they mention the following:

1) Additional Well Diagnostics including Pressure Build Up Test & further core tests

2) Optimization of stimulation & artificial lift techniques

In the 15th Jan 26 RNS they mention the following:

1) "The proceeds help underpin the Company's plans for the Dubhe-1 testing which include the acquisition and analysis of new and existing well data, preparing procedures for a cost effective and productivity enhancing start-up leading to resumption of the flow testing programme. "

2) Max Easley, Chief Executive Officer, said: "Today's financing further enables our forward programme at Dubhe-1. Prior to the suspension of testing in December the well was exhibiting increased gas production volumes, and we are very keen to recommence operations after pressure build-up and other analysis has been completed. Completion of the testing programme will determine the next steps for the development of the Ahpun asset and will potentially unlock significant value for the Company.

A couple of questions for you Cbaron

1) Whats is Discord speculating that we havent been told ?

2) Do you know what they mean by "Acquisition and analysis of new and existing well data" - in particular the acquisition part - are they talking about new well cores or something different.

3) The only positives for me is the tone of the last RNS and in particular Max's relatively upbeat remarks about recommencing operations and next steps for the development of Alphun in the face of what otherwise looks like rather "unsettling" results to date not to mention the ramifications for the Alphun field as a whole.

Good post Cbarron - to clarify you saying your “not unnerved” or your not a shorter. Not interested in the shorter bit but if your saying not unnerved - what gives you this confidence in what has been said or what your research tells you?

Not at all James - any of the balanced posters can see you dig yourself deeper into a hole of stupidity with every post.

Undoubtedly there are few that are annoyed that I’m constributing to this child like back and forth but I feel like it’s a price worth paying to highlight the idiots and disingenuous on this BB.

Again if you want to challenge me on anything that I’ve posted that’s not balanced or fair - let me know - I’ll gladly address.

James,

I can assure you that I’ve read and re-read all recent RNS’s and POD casts as well as doing extensive research - I’m pretty sure the same cannot be said for you.

As far as your comment on “minor set back” - wtf are you talking about - the SP indicates that current Dubhe1 results are considerably more than a minor setback. The flow test is not complete (acknowledged) but conventional wisdom is that results would have been expected to have been better at this stage and that “within the envelope of expectation” is a neat way of saying they are currently not at the top end of expectation.

Dubhe1 is a key result - if it doesn’t come in then valuations move an order of magnitude lower.

HHReturns - your reply was half sensible until you got to this bit:

“You just want a verbal scrap because you were likely bullied and want to be involved in a conversation, even as an unwelcome participant. You want people to articulate fully their views on here just for you to get all puffed up and argue with them or belittle them because they don't work in the industry. It's weird and unhealthy to be as unpleasant as you are.”

What is weird is that you think it’s ok for people like yourself, BricksSA, Zen and James Simon to post “bargain, to the moon, lift off, once in a life time opportunity” without a shed of justification / explanation to fellow posters, yet if you question this rubbish - you are taken to task.

I’ll tell you what’s unhealthy and morally corrupt is people like you pretending to bring a bit of balance to a conversation.

As I said before - tell me what comments in my posts you have issue with - and I’ll explain or gladly withdraw.

The other point of note is that you and James seem to think that this is your BB - do either of you halfwits understand that I don’t need your permission to post.

James,

I realize that with all your multi million pound London property deals and the tens of million of shares you hold in PANR - time is of the essence and very valuable to you. I’m just asking that you spend a few minutes sharing your expertise here for the benefit of us less informed and more emotional investors - is that too much to ask?

I’m willing to put a little bit of thought process behind some of my views. I hope for the sake of genuine posters here with a bit of balance that the following guys do the same - are you not affended that they fail to back up their posts with anything sensible. If it happen on the street it would be called pick-pocketing!

1) James Simon

2) BrickSA

3) zen

4) HHReturns

Oh the Irony

“Let's not pretend you are here to help out, or even be balanced rather than just negative”

Actually I am - just you muppets are unable to see it . I have asked James, Zen and now I’ll ask HHReturns to do the same- please present the Investment Rationale here. Also please highlight where I have been unduly negative. Being balanced means taking on board the positive along with the negative. How is it that you guys never challenge and positive posts even if the facts do not fully support ??

Then there’s David Hobbs - came in sometime after the previous high ( which was an all time high of around 140p if my memory serves me correct). Was a bit of fresh air and implemented a new strategy I.e. don’t rely on a farm in and focus on early production in the Alpun Field to help fund Kodiak. Seemed sensible but he’s on two strikes now - normally 3 and you are out!

Zen - what a complete load of tosh - no wonder Simon likes your post. First off - you can be positive or negative on a stock and make money by going long or short. Personally I never short but obviously those that did or sold out in the 20p to 35p range knew a lot more that me or you, obviously a lot more than Simon and I won’t even mention BricksSA . Selling out imo proved to be emotionally smart. Those that hung in one could say we’re emotionally weak or attached to the shares.

This one was another pearl of yours from a few days ago:

“Panr is well on its way to returning to its former highs. It's highly likely SP will soon reach a year - ago high 🤞”

Perhaps you can explain your logic here to those that are emotionally weak! It should be noted that Simon has repeatedly posted non-sense like this and consistently decline to back it up with a rationale.

I can highlight a couple of facts that seem to demonstrate what you are spouting is a bit of a stretch . Just as a reminder - the recent high was a year ago at around 70p. If you could recap event and go over what’s gone right , what’s gone wrong and see whether your comments hold any water

BricksSA - there are a few idiots on this board - James has to be pretty close to the top with you not far behind.

The 4 questions I asked which sort or relate to the recent RNS and are key to valuation and I would imagine any curious investor would like to hear about. James appeared unwilling or more likely unable to provide any insight. Instead projecting and I think is struggling to get a prescription for viagra. You in concert appear to buy into his “undervalued, oversold and once in a lifetime investment opportunity” without a shed of explanation - strange I would say but hey ho - welcome to his fan club!

Ok James - perhaps I've been a little to hard on you - can you outline the investment thesis here. Specifically could you address the following:

1) whats the pressure build up test going to tell us and more importantly how will that impact the results of the complete flow test.

2) Looking at a worst case scenario and assuming that the Dubhe1 well test is a commercial failure - what does this mean for the rest of the Alphun Field

3) Again taking a worst case scenario and assuming a Dubhe1 failure - what farm out terms are we likely to get in your view for the Kodiak field

4) What is your target price assuming a Dubhe 1 failure and success in farming out Kodiak.

Presumably you've run these scenarios before telling felling investors to "climb in.... investment opportunity of a lifetime"