Member Info for Toffers

At the end of the day scotty, they're driving traffic to this site/forum, which helps with advertising revenue!!! You can make of that what you will. I enjoy the podcasts on here, I thank lse for those, but for what goes on here with the abuse, that's another thing entirely and it seems that they can't be stopped!

Trouble with blocking scotty is that if I write something it doesn't matter what credence it might have, they just attack with abuse, and then they post something in response that they've twisted to try and put their own argument forward with which is 99% of he time balderdash. That's why it's difficult to block them. But I'm not posting so much as I'm just fed up with their vitriol, it's so obvious what they are doing.

Doesn't that should say

DR if you think its okay to get posters banned because their rhetoric does suit yours and your pals agendas then that's up to you, but quite frankly, no one listens to you, IKN, and Leno any more, and I'm sure I'm right when saying that.

The problem is this however, look how many people voted last year considering the amount of shares in issue!

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/EUA/result-of-agm-b4cqn7pmxuyl8dj.html

Just because the share certificates are lost does not mean that they don't own the shares any more, they still remain the beneficial owners of them.

IKN, they are still the beneficial owners of the shares, that entitles them to vote.

IKN, I provided the evidence previously to show they can vote, but yet again, you just completely ignore it. Totally fed up with you and your continual nonsense.

Suppose I'd better add imo as usual. Just to add IKN, I have no idea who will win or lose, that's for the Judge to determine on the evidence he or she hears and we are not privy to that, so no one can say. On the balance of probabilities however, as I've said, the Judge hasn't thrown it out as no case to answer, so it will run, and the Judge will think to him or herself well what would the reasonable man expect if he's lost share certificates and has notified the company and gone to the lengths to go through the hoops to do as they ask and get indemnity insurance? If they should lose it, how they pay the damages I've no idea, as us mere mortals don't know if their indemnity insurers will cover it or not, or to how much if not fully. I hope that may be someone will ask at the AGM may be. all imo.

Jarv they provided an insurance indemnity for the company to approve but the company did nothing. Look at the dates for all the communications, yes there was a gap from the claimants for a while, but effectively, the company dragged it's feet regardless even when the claimants were trying to make headway. I hve stated previously, despite IKN continually trying to twist it, they claim damages at point 5, those damages are not quantified, they are unquantified because until the Judge decides firstly, whether the company should have replaced the certificates or not in a timely manner, and certainly when the offer of indemnity insurance was provided, then it is impossible to know what the claimants will then state was their intention as to when they would sell, and how many shares they would have sold. When the judge determines that, if the claimants are successful in arguing that the certificates should have been replaced, then he can hear evidence on the loss suffered by both claimants and work out a figure. He or she will then award that sum and also all legal costs of the claimants to be paid by the defendants (the company), if the claimants win on the first point, which is were they denied the opportunity of having those certificates replaced. My view is that they were in that an offer of indemnity insurance was made by two companies from recollection jointly, which had a 30 day period of acceptance, but the company did nothing and so it expired, and then the claimants couldn't get another offer as the war had started. If the case had no merit, as I have said before, the Judge would have thrown it out at first instance. By the way, from where did you get the wording for the amended defence?, as you haven't stated your source, and caseboard has copyright and I'm sure they wouldn't be pleased if you have taken it from there word for word. Better to summarise so that there's no breach of copyright/plagurism from their site. If you visited the High Court and made a request to inspect the documentation then that's different, but I suspect that isn't the case. Just saying.

Jarv this is what I have been saying, there is a claim for damages, which is unquantifiable and i've explained why previously, plus that defence is spurious imo, the claimants had been in correspondence since 2018, so for 3 years before the proceedings were issued.

Well said Spikey. I won't be posting any more on this forum. Certain things need to be investigated. That said, I wish the genuine lths, many of whom were around in early 2019 when I first bought in, and to those who are genuine and have held longer, although not the likes of certain members of the TG group, the very best, I sincerely hope you recover some of your losses, and that this sad tale to date, has a happy ending for you. Best wishes, Toffers

Ps give my love to Longford friendsps!

Friendsps you say pointless conversing and then what, you post another post straight after! Go and have a guinness with your mates ikn, mac, wtf, dr, tramore and the rest. Nite.

That is hilarious, I can't stop laughing ;)

"you are not wise" - we won't go there on that one!

"you listen to know one" - an FCA and you can't even spell, I spat my tea out at that one!

"you are very dangerous" - I spat all my tea out at that one, that is the funniest thing anyone has ever said to me, I'm quite touched actually, I'll take it as a compliment!

Answers on a postcard, who does everyone think friendsps is? he's beginning to give himself away!

Funnily enough, I don't use twitter very often, I'm not a big fan of Musk.

Anyone noticed friendsps joined just about the same time as Mac, in Nove 2016? coincidence? I think not. And just when Mac had abandoned his Aberdeenman handle because of all the abuse he was getting following his complete rampage of cloudtag, and doing the same to investors there as what he has now been doing here. Coincidence? I think not.

Wonder when the countdown clock will appear to when Mac finally offers to buy everyones shares for less than a penny as he did on cloudtag and then no doubt hands them over to the company for a very nice return? all imo.

And by the way friendsps you question others, so yes, it does give others the right to question you.

Friendsps, you said you weren't going to post during working hours, and then promptly post today during tea break time for you. That's a fact! I'd agree with wolfe, I've already said heaven help your clients when your patrolling this forum suddenly rather than dealing with their financial affairs with due care and attention! Oh I forgot though, they don't work in Ireland do they! Or may be Keith is opening an office there! imo.