Member Info for Toffers

5 days to an asset sale announcement according to IKN! You heard it here first!

Money Week seem to be featuring Gold, and state that "with stubborn inflation ......... and with price rises proving stickier than expected and fears of stagnation spreading amid signs of poor productivity and growth, there is plenty of bad news to keep gold bouyant." Sounds good to me. Not seen the actual article, it was just a snippet on an email from them.

Ceejay, my mother died in 1999, god rest her soul, she spent many years suffering from parkinsons, you are disgusting.

Just my musings for a thundery Bank Holiday Saturday afternoon, but I suspect I'm not alone, but I remember the cloudtag debacle, that was my first biggest lost on AIM, Eurasia being the other, but with cloudtag, does anyone remember that Ben-Haim managed to secure a convertible loan facility fairly early on after the first round of positive news? He secured a 1.25 mill unsecured loan facility from Hector Limited, a private equity company specialist, and the funds could be drawn for general working capital purposes amongst other things in traches or in full, with 10% interest back then in 2016 and 3.7% admin fee. The loan could be repaid by way of new ordinary shares if so desired at 2.25p per share, conditional on sufficient authority from shareholders.

9 months later there was significant movement in the share price and then a placing took place on the back of that before the company was finally suspended in February 2017 and subsequently delisted.

My point is, I think Shaun has said there is already sufficient funding for the present, he has the backing of at least 3 banks if necessary to secure extra funding, and I'm just wondering, should further cash be required, could he go the same route and get a convertible loan facility rather than possibly diluting shareholders, until such time as there is a definite rise in the sp and it makes sense to do a placing then off the back of that rise? If he could indicate this would be his preferred option if further funding were to be required upon the asx cross listing etc, then it might help to steady the market a bit more, and give us a lift may be? Just my thoughts.

No Sale of any asset - 2023

No sale of concentrate so far - 2023

No sale of any asset - 2022

No sale of any asset - 2021

No sale of any asset - 2020

No sale of any asset - 2019

No sale of any asset - 2018

No sale of any asset - 2017

No sale of any asset - 2016

No sale of any asset - 2015

There's a few 1 share trades floating around! GLA.

At the end of the day, it's immaterial what they are, binding, non binding, nda, etc, because nothing has happened. It's doubtful those who did sign anything, whoever they were and if it ever was the case, are still even in communication with the company about a possible sale, and now with low visibility, in all honesty, it would make you think not, and that they, whoever they are, have walked away and ripped any paperwork up! In all honesty, how can you spin the tale of a sale from 2019 or even earlier? As each year passes, it becomes more and more absurd! My views. Catch up laters.

The company have said there is no guarantee of entering in to any non binding agreements! Can you not see the irony? Look up non binding agreements, they are exactly that, non binding, they are not enforceable, hence why they are called non binding!

As you say yourself Leno, I quote you, "3 years" it's been said, because that's only a part of the time that the company have been spinning out the supposed sale, which you lot keep saying is coming tomorrow, but tomorrow never comes does it! and so it goes on! and now with the dreaded low visibility to boot!

A non binding agreement is not legally enforceable Jarv and doesn't create any obligations, so in essence, they are not worth the paper they are written on. So when the company says it has entered in to non binding agreements, they are effectively worthless and mean nothing. Hence the term non binding!

You won't get any comments friendsps, as they are already under investigation, which is ongoing, and has been for some time, and rightly so, in my opinion. As I said, they are my views, hence the investigation is based on my views and what I feel about it all, but especially the Queeld matter.

This is the very argument I would showcasing in the High Court case, the company only choose to reveal what they want to reveal for the continual lining of their own pockets, not what is in shareholders best interests at all. They chose not to reveal the High Court case relating to Queeld to shareholders for 18 months and only then after it had been detected by another shareholder and made public, no doubt because had they done so, they knew the writing would be on the wall with the sp, and similarly, in my view, they did the same to Queeld, it didn't suit their agenda to have shares flooding on to the open market for sale, so they put a spanner in the works. This is NOT acting in shareholders best interests, it's tantamount to concealment/deception, and that's why there is now so much distrust of this Board and Shaffelitsky should have stood down with immediate effect at the AGM, but instead, he continues to rob you of your hard earned cash by lining his own pocket with his pension and salary from you all, and you sit there and not one of you challenged it at the AGM. If the company loses the case, you'll all then start moaning, but it will be too late, you had your chance to remove Shaffelitsky and others at the AGM, and it would have been the job of the company to find a replacement by way of advertisement not by way of the old boys network which they seem to prefer! My views.

Beast, yes, I took some losses, but at least I got most of my holdings out between 16p and 12p, as compared to the dire situation now of less than 3p! Had the company been honest about the High Court case of Queeld and informed shareholders of it in December 2021, I would have been out at 21p+ but they chose not to reveal something which was price sensitive information and would affect shareholders with a further unmitigating drop in sp to where it is now!

"If confidentiality is to be covered in a contract for a project or commercial arrangement, a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) will be needed in most cases" source: flintbishop

but the company say;

"However, the company also said that there could be no guarantee that Eurasia would enter into binding agreements regarding the sales process." source: marketscreener

So, if they are not entering in to any binding agreements, they don't need any non discloure agreements as there's no contract, nada.

But then they contradict themselves elsewhere Jarv. Hence the confusion. So how many have been consigned to the rubbish bin then?

If you're referring to me Beast, I used to hold in excess of 2.7 million shares here, so you can imagine there might be a fair bit of loss, and you have the gall to keep attacking me. I was probably a holder for far longer than you have been and probably with a lot more shares. You've probably not been invested at all, just here as a part of the Mac crew to try and keep the sp bolstered for the company imo.

Your last post is suggesting that GGP is corrupt, is that right? in which case, why are you hoping for 88p sp as a return? Kindly explain.

Incase you're too tired to look it up in all the write up on the website archways, this is the London number for you to ring and chat to them, give it a call, nothing ventured nothing gained as they always say - 020 7317 2504, wishing you the very best x

Https://www.hcahealthcare.co.uk/facilities/the-harley-street-clinic/our-centres/the-london-cyberknife-centre?y_source=1_NTI1MzYzOTItNDgzLWxvY2F0aW9uLndlYnNpdGU%3D

Caught up now. Nite.