Member Info for tkevin

You probably got a six month pay off so was still on staff.

Given that not a single person from GDR replied to his linked post suggests there wasn’t much love for his tenure.

Amers - “ if the 'No' vote prevails, it could open up numerous opportunities. This includes the potential to replace certain members of the Board of Directors, align executive salaries with the share price, and introduce share-based bonuses that truly reflect the company’s performance”

Now that going to happen in the 3 weeks before bankruptcy, when the Company has already said there are no alternative funding options?

Maybe “amers” and DN are the same person. Explains the worship.

There was a chat board full of crazy self interested manipulators, this is it.

So Kingsteve, from what I can see the first post you ever made on GDR was 6 October, and you apparently feel the invested energy to demand a Board change? Go back to your Pokémon cards mate.

What should change is Gilham as chairman, been there for 13 years at £5k a meeting and has overseen a spectacular destruction in shareholder value. Gino is limping along because no one else wanted the job, Russ is collecting a paycheck making sure all the columns still add to zero.

Odd to imagine how bankrupting a company leads to a higher share price.

he sounds a right ****.

I think we should place wagers on when this week they will come with their begging bowl and cut out holdings by 50% and require more of our cash. I’m going for Thursday for £5.

Gloria dont be a muppet Budd left 2 years ago

Roger woke up this morning and I guess again decided to just be a moron.

There were hundreds of FDA submissions for covid tests and the fda just stopped approving them after a while

If they hadn’t done the small raise, they’d now be bankrupt.

Gino’s is paid £200k plus bonus and Russ is paid £162k plus bonus. Gilham is paid £6.5k per day and the other BODs get £3.5k per day, assuming 10 days worked per year. It’s in the annual accounts.

“Assessing” abroad range of financial options is very different from “having” a broad range of financial options. The only source of money for the company is private investors and if we choose not to invest in the company then it’s gone. If we choose to invest, then it will go into the salaries of the executives and there will iMO be no more commercial traction in the limited extended life than there was previously. Either way, PI lose. I go with the attitude of you don’t throw good money after bad.

I think they have no plan. For the last two fundraisers they’ve been unable to get anyone other than private investors and peel hunt onboard they’ve just come back to private investors with the attitude that if we don’t put our hands in our pocket then the company will go bust and that’s our problem, while at the same time showing repeated distain for PIs and not taking any action themselves to reduce run costs while lining their executive pockets with inflated salaries far beyond anything they actually earn in achievement. There’s the saying about not throwing good money after bad and I think this is a case of a good idea with unfortunately very little commercial execution and if any time the idea actually does get market traction, it’s not going to be under the name of genedrive and it’s not going to be us as shareholders.

I’ll vote for if they cut their salaries by 50%. Otherwise it’s a no for me.

Roger you’re a plonker implying the board is choosing between options, they have no options and you will be served with whatever they can swing.

Difficult to attract real talent when you are on a descent.

We already lost everything and you’re just proposing funding their £1m a year in salaries and bonus. I’ll invest if they cut their salaries and bonuses by 50%. Otherwise it can sink.