Member Info for tinlode

If, If, If.

Reported again.

ABLE writes rubbish on other boards too.

One bar is 14.7 psi.
By closing the pipe down with your fingers to get the squirting effect you are restricting the flow right down to represent near to the static pressure in the pipe, which, if the height is 30ft above the end of the pipe the pressure is about 15 psi at the pipe end.
If you remove your fingers and let the pipe flow without restriction at the end, you will notice the flow rises only a few inches, maybe 12 inches or so, above the end of the pipe, showing that where there is a flow the pressure now drops dramatically.
Each hydraulic system model is different and depends on many hydraulic features: head, pressure, pressure change, velocity, orifices, sunken orifices, venturis, bends, throttles and so on and so on. So direct comparison cannot be made with any other hydraulic system.
The hydralics of the engine cooling system of the high speed train was so different to any similar systems that it caused overheating in the 1980's with continuous loss of cooling until the reasons were found and a modifed system designed. Leakage problems also caused severe coolant loss. Meanwhile the drivers were provided with a 40 gallon drum of coolant in their cab which they pumped continuously into the system with a semi rotary hand pump during the journeys. The high speed train engines now continue to run and do so successfully.
So let it be said ICE2 is not the first system with problems which have to be overcome, and will be overcome.

One bar is 14.7 psi.
By closing the pipe down with your fingers to get the squirting effect you are restricting the flow right down to represent close to the static pressure in the pipe, which if the height is 30ft above the end of the pipe the pressure is about 15 psi at the pipe end.
If you remove your fingers and let the pipe flow without restriction at the end, you will notice the flow rises only a few inches, maybe 12 inches or so, above the end of the pipe, showing that where there is a flow the pressure now drops dramatically.
Each hydraulic system model is different and depends on many hydraulic features: head, pressure, pressure change, velocity, orifices, sunken orifices, venturis, bends, throttles and so on and so on. So direct comparison cannot be made with any other hydraulic system.
The hydralics of the engine cooling system of the high speed train was so different to any similar systems that it caused overheating in the 1980's with continuous loss of cooling until the reasons were found and a modifed system designed. Meanwhile the drivers were provided with a 40 gallon drum of coolant in their cab which they pumped continuously with a semi rotary hand pump during the journeys.

Just caught up with JBG barracking.
Reported again.

0621 post reported.
Statement not based on any knowledge.

You obviously have no children Punk, or you would not be swearing on here. Please desist.

It all depends wich side of the decimal point you put all the zeros, nothing more, but consolidation will cost, can the BOD afford to spend at the moment.

I will be a long term holder in this company so daily price movements will not effect my buying programme. Nor do I set stop losses as I continually monitor prices and need to be in control of my own investments.

No, we're not lunatic ship watchers, we just love the diversity of ships and also that's what's going to make this project work.

There shouldn't be cavitation problems here because the system is being pushed from the bottom, not pulled.

High static pressure in any hydraulic system will drop when the system is opened to flow. Also this sytem being vertical the pressure gradient top to bottom will have a large influence on the top pressure. Well head pressure of 816 psi would give you a 'gusher' of over 400 feet, fantastic. if it were allowed. I wish I had those sort of pressures available when I was trying to eliminating cavitation and overheating of the high speed train in the mid 1980s

Positive news, very good. Will take a day or two to sink in.

Yes, they seem very insincere towards investors here, as you say, thinking like a private company. Investors seem to be baggage to be put up with, information seems to be loosely thrown out' Sorry, can't take the risk.

I would not invest in a company where the CEO has not bought into the company..If he believes in the future success you would expect him to put his money where his expectations are. And you hear the same philosophy from dragons den members when they refuse to invest. Lesson learnt.

argos I would imagine by your comments about 88e that you drive a left handed wheelbarrow on the wrong side of the road.Please stay away from 88e, it will be safer.

Yes, but if it was a labour government in, they would be clambering to say everything is fine and dandy.

A buy is a buy and a sell is a sell and should so be recorded. Anything else is a fudge.

Wish I could get some for 0.00059 pence!