RE: Back in14 Apr 2021 11:47
IMO, it's too early to buy back in; the crisis hasn't arrived yet.
In essence, the key question is whether Ukraine is a truly independent country, or whether it is a Russian vassal state. If Ukraine agrees to defer to Russia in its international relations (i.e. no Nato, no EU etc.), and to make concessions regarding the Crimea and the Donbass, then I think Putin would be happy with that and back off. But Ukrainian society (which admires Europe, and which rather likes freedom and democracy) simply will not accept those terms.
So, IMO, there will be a test of strength before any resolution is reached. And, yes, the Ukrainian Army is in a better state than it was in 2014, but that is saying very little. It is no match for a determined Russian military offensive.
Looking at the disposition of forces, and especially the Russian concentration around Voronezh and the naval deployments, I'd guess the Russian attack plan is to use the Donbass front to pin the Ukrainian army in place. That would be followed by a strike towards Kharkov and the Dniepr and an amphibious assault on the Azov Sea coast near Mariopol, leading to the encirclement of the Ukrainian Army. Honestly, even if the Ukrainians know that is what is coming, they probably couldn't stop it.
Two quotes for you:
Herodotus (the father of history): "the strong take what they can and the weak suffer what they must."
Putin: "The strong push the weak against the wall and fcuk them up the ass." (This from an individual of minuscule stature who was viciously bullied as a child, before he decided the best way to do his own bullying was to join the biggest and baddest gang of them all, the KGB.)