Member Info for TheRevd

Laura posts - ‘ The management team also attended the Bio-Europe Spring healthcare event in Lisbon this week, where a number of meetings were held in relation to P140’

This is assumptions and not communicated by the BODs - can you outline who they were talking to & what the outcome was ?

I think the answer you are looking for is SORRY I MADE ALL THAT UP TO GAIN LIKES FROM THE FORUM.

If posts are factual, fine, if not expect to be corrected.

Let’s look forward to seeing a blue day tomorrow - that may not be fact but at least it’s possible 🤓

The Revd.

Just accept that they who proclaim others not worthy are definitely not worthy 😄

They are clearly unwell and have no other joy 🥺

Just filter.

Like I said earlier those who don’t allow others views have no real views of value.

That may be a standard of life.

I have researched Laura’s posting history, and it does follow a pattern, that causes disruption and mistrust of anyone with opposing views or opinions.

Maybe talk about the stock and not the stock holders :)

I have been accused of being ‘a new old poster’ - wrong.

I have been accused of not owning shares - wrong.

At least I have not been accused of using personal slurs against others.

The Revd.

Kindness costs £0.00

Arthur Gard posts “Now we are properly funded to get the P140 deal done and expand the portfolio”

Can you give anyone a proposed timescale that you have ? Bearing in mind that the initial deal was going to be 2025. A genuine question that you may not wish to commit to, which under the circumstances is totally understandable.

The Revd.

Arthur G - I posted yesterday that I would invest and I did 13:47 yesterday @ 4.1p if you want send me a read request & I will oblige - on receipt of your investment details - when you try and smite someone make sure you’re not assuming!!

I will not though assume that it gives me the right to question anybody about their personal finances or anything else for that matter. My posts will remain focused on IMM and whether I increase my investment subject to movement after the next Lanstead move.

The Revd.

Sinitta - I can assure you that I have nothing in common with the other posters you refer too, they do not hold, I do, they’re constantly making negative statements unsupported by any facts, I don’t.

Sinitta, let me ask you one question, do you believe that the CEO is still in negotiations with any large pharmaceutical companies, and if so why has that not been referenced lately ?

Until officially confirmed of course some investors will be sceptical, that’s human nature isn’t it ?

The Revd.

Psychologically speaking IMM are already in a win win situation, they have even got some investors posting that 2028 is the year of delivery.

After all that’s when the funds are due to expire, although it’s highly likely that there will be more fundraisers to come in the interim.

I hope for a spike that happened previously to subsidise my investment.

The Revd.

2025 - Year of delivery

2026 - Year of delivery

If your boss tells you you’re getting a pay rise next month and it never happens, what do you do ?

Isn’t that what the situation is here ?

The other element I am slightly concerned about is the acceptance of P140 by major pharmas - CEO Says it’s a game changer, it certainly has changed the game, he has now changed his focus to another opportunity, that could well swallow up funds very quickly.

I see this as a huge risk, which is the same as most Aim stocks that rely on market sentiment and the CEO’s ability to control the narrative.

And yes I have invested but have done so with all the above in mind.

The Revd.

Thanks Muck - much appreciated.

The Revd.

Hamila - please read the post again - I put in brackets Not you - meaning the comment was NOT aimed at you.

And I didn’t say respect views that are not supported by evidence, but confirm and research those comments to prove your conviction in your investment.

Saying : All that glitters is not gold.

I have invested a small amount in order to not be unintentionally excluded from the risk/reward here.

I will invest additional funds when both the charts and sentiment change, probably after the initial quake of Lanstead activity.

The Revd.

Hamila - sorry should add that it is not up to anyone else ( not you ) to play supreme judge on any forum. After all I’m sure all of us have made stupid inaccurate statements before and regretted it after.

The Revd.

Hamilton - a fair point, which is exactly why both views are valuable.

The post which could be totally wrong should prompt the reader to undertake some research, and the post that is based on fact should also be validated by the reader to ensure its validity.

And that is completely my point - all views are valuable and should be accepted, may be not respected, although that is the prerogative of the reader.

The Revd.

I don’t have a problem with when or how often someone posts, but do take exception when someone tells someone, in a discourteous manner to ‘move on’

All posters views are valuable and should be respected.

TheRevd

Laura, having told me that my reasonable views were unacceptable to you, I am dismayed that you now turn your attention to a long term investor, telling them to sell up and move on.

Can I ask you, considering that you turned up on the IMM forum about 1 month ago, and ramping the living daylights out of the share, what gives you the right to dictate any directives to others on here ?

I could suggest that you yourself cease posting your views, but that would be very draconian and not receptive to other points of view, that, at the end of the day is what an informative forum is all about.

Please keep your personal views about other posters to yourself and be respectful of others views.

TheRevd.

That’s very unkind to filter someone for an opinion.

I honestly don’t think I have said anything bad about IMM if so I apologise. I thought this forum was going to be more receptive and not weird like another forum I have left behind.

I will not post until I have invested I think that is fair. Although I do read and take on board both sides of the debate here.

P.S. I am not Onetomany with the reference to ouzo he mentioned that the other day I think.

I said that I was going to buy in here, and I will when it gets below the 3p mark.

The market is going to react to the landstead dumps in the next couple of weeks/months- look at how today’s news was greeted.

Reading all the posts / news I don’t know whether P140 is all the CEO said it was ?

Surely a pharma would have snapped them up by now if it was ground breaking tech.

The Revd - better the devil you know ……

Should have bought on Friday DOH !

Still going to buy though.

I have followed this for a few months now and may invest tomorrow, based on where financially this should actually sit at the moment, around 6p would be realistic.

I do not understand though some posters saying 2p etc and some saying £1 ??

It seems that there is still some way to go to get any meaningful results / contract awards here.

A good 12 month project though.

The Revd.

Is news due ?