Ascot and Racecourse19 Jan 2022 18:48
Its a shame that it has been released this late, i hear from the interview he says its because of timezones , however just keep it for an hr and release it tomorrow, it wont effect anything and gets alot more attention.
Comparing the two interviews, the previous one where he talked about a quick sell, i had a lot of issue with tbh.
This company interview, is much better.
My final moan is that i also wish he had released ascot (hole 35) as a separate RNS. They are different, i have said this previously but i also appreciate its upto him.
Anyway: Bushranger we always thought it tapered out where 18-22 are. (when i did a rough model last year i had barely any tonnage up there). Still good lengths and all adding to the open pit as its above cut off, its also adding to the tonnage. It's looking more like 600-700m at .3 Cueq, rather than 500m at .4.
Moving to Ascot. Bang as expected and hoped, which was incredibly high! I think my blog diagram was not too far off from the geo cross section, importantly we've got good copper, some gold (probably a 10 on the dice roll) and it starts near surface. The gold is probably commercial (unlike Racecourse). Also some signs that the grading is better a bit further down.
This is important, as I've been banging on this will , IMO, improve as the system goes south and rises. So that better grading gets bigger and closer to the surface (much like RC). I wouldn't be surprised to get holes of 300-400m at .8 to 1.0 CuEq maybe half a km to one km further south.
We need to explore Ascot, Yes RC is still massively attractive and worth far more than the current MCAP, but we need to show that Ascot is 2km or so in length and more importantly that the core of Ascot is not only profitable and commercial but highly desirable.
By all means sound out AA and enter an Exc Agreement, but please please lets continue to put more holes into Ascot while we do the model and MRE for RC.