Member Info for TheCondorMan

in other words you are saying you cant provide proof... and so come up with some silly excuse that it's private company. YET CICx was a listed company at the time... provide the evidence that the Jin Ce license referred to in the presentation was transferred to CICx. Go on.. waiting. Or may be SB forgot to issue such price sensitive news ? Any so called assets that claimed to be in the CICx family, i take with a pinch of salt.. thats my opinion. Why ? because there are numerous RNS releases over the past 10 years that claimed they had acquired assets... but over time they melt away never to be mentioned again. Just like they kept telling you they would "seek" and get the CAD$millions..... once the HSBC account was opened ... those were assets they claimed to have.. it was in the balance sheet.......revenue that was book which inflated the asset value..... what happened ? It was never mentioned again. I can mention so many others. A bit like someone kept saying "block 6 in the bag"..... you remember that ? All imho

The fact that the company that owns the other Jin Ce license have NEVER declared selling or transferring it to a third party ie CICx I cant provide proof of something that NEVER happened. However, you and your friend are implying the license in the presentation that said it had millions of oz gold potential (which clearly state it belonged to another company) is now owed by CICx. So please provide the proof that CICx Jin Ce license has a technical report saying they own it and has similar millions of oz.

Provide an independent link to show CICx own a license in Jin Ce and that it has a technical report to state it has millions of oz of Au. Come one you are so confident that they have this license.... show me an independent link proving this. Not the claims made by the company. I can show many claims (via RNS) made by the company that never materialised and melted away never to be mentioned again.

BU you as well are blinded by your rise tints. CICx did advisory work for that Jin Ce license operator (as per the presentation). That pdf is a technical report..... it clearly shows who owns that license.

Let's spell it out for you Joey. Where in that presentation does it state that that particular license belongs to CICx ? Now read this and read it again.... Jin Ce is not ONE specific license... its a prospective area in a large province. Get it ? CICx do NOT own the Jin Ce license you tried to allude in the presentation which claimed a potential of millions oz. That particular license is NOT owned by CICx. Get it ? CICx own another exploration license in the Jin Ce prospective area..... comprende ?

that particular Jin Ce license was owned by Guizhou Jin Ce Mining Co. Ltd. It was you JoeY who put up the link to that presentation and boasted about it having milliions of oz of gold..... when that presentation clearly stated who owned that license.... it WAS NOT CICx. When you were caught out with that misleading post and challenged...you changed tact and came up with excuse "A lot can happen and change in that period. " implying CICx acquired that particular license thereafter.... so playing along with your hypothesis.. I once again challenged you to show the news release where Guizhou Jin Ce Mining Co. Ltd. transferred or sold that license to CICx. You failed to provide it. Also, I challenged you to show me the RNS or CPR that states the particular Jin Ce license which is apparently owned by CICx contains millions of oz of gold (as per the presentation your provided) On each count you failed pretty miserably (as usual) and instead posted more nonsensical responses.

lol... you provided that link.. not me... what are you implying ? that, that Jin Ce license was acquired by CICx ? Show me the RNS where it states that ? Surely the entity that owned that particular license would have issued a news release ? So where is it ? Show me the RNS or CPR that states the particular Jin Ce license which is apparently owned by CICx contains millions of oz of gold (as per the presentation your provided) Put up or shut up

Advisory services are also being provided to the Jin Ce gold project located near China's second largest gold mine operation, Jinfeng, formally owned by Sino Gold Mining, Ltd., (now Eldorado Gold Corp.). A Canadian NI43-101 technical report on the Jin Ce gold project was completed in January 2010 by CIC Mining Resources and is available from via the SEDAR website. http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/11/01/c789530/cic-mining-offers-2-5-million-private-placement

correction... not Jin Ce province but in Guizhou Province

JoeY, JoeY, JoeY..... more misleading nonsense. Where does it state in that presentation that CICx owns that particular license in Jin Ce province ? That presentation has absolutely nothing to do with CICx owning that license ... it's just a presentation that shows the provinces gold production potential. That particular presentation shows who owns that specific license. If you did a bit of research (a big ask) you'll find ouin January 2010 by CIC Mining Resources provided advisory services to the company that owned that license. Advisory serviceswere being provided to Guizhou Jin Ce Mining Co. who co-won the Jin Ce mine. Guizhou Jin Ce Mining Co. Ltd. is a Sino Joint Venture Company which is 95% owned by Perfect Ally Limited. That presentation has nothing to do with any type of ownership of that license linking it to CICx

and all the luck to you as well.... you'll definitely need it when it comes to CICG by the way... it's SB not JB.

Greenfield Exploration.. this is what CICG is involved in.... this has two subdivision : Grassroot Exploration Project and Advanced Exploration Project The latter projects have clearly defined mineral resources with reasonable prospects for being developed into standalone mines or satellite mines. In the mine life cycle, these projects are generally positioned between the near pre-feasibility stage and the near bankable feasibility stage. CICG is the former. When a geologist has a conceptual idea about where a mineral deposit might be and spends money to see if the mineralization is really there, this is referred to as grassroot exploration. Common activities include: airborne satellite surveys, ground based geological and geophysical prospecting and surveying as well as determining drill target areas. Grassroot exploration projects are the riskiest projects in the mining business. Some statistics indicate that only 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 10,000 grassroot exploration projects ever reach the production stage. source : http://www.undervaluedequity.com/Mineral-Exploration-Companies-Greenfield-Exploration-vs.-Brownfield-Exploration.html The activities stated above are included in today's RNS. So 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 10,000 chance of this ever reaching commercial status. And you have CICG paying £5.6m for it ? No wonder it was paid in paper.

"CICG wouldn`t bother buying the fields say back of me as they know there isn`t any gold , this site has been picked as they are pretty sure they have got a good site for gold ." there you go again... EVERY explorer thinks there's a resource in any field they acquire. Otherwise why would a resource company acquire a field ? to play football ? Every resource company has confidence they'll find something worthwhile.. otherwise why buy the license ? Its the chance of probabilities that will determine if they are successful. And the FACT, and yes FACT, is that a successful discovery of a greenfield site is 10000:1. if you think I am taking the mick.... its because some of the stuff you write is hilarious... its devoid of any sort of substance. Just cliches and rampish nonsense that these boards have become accustomed to.

just to correct mr resource guru..... CICG is not a miner.... it's not even an explorer.. yet.

"A good gold miner gets it right most of the time and can find the gold fast , just the shape of the land they know where the gold is ." lol.. absolutely priceless... if only cliches were investment ideas.. you'd be quids in.

"You kept hammering on about this share has gone down ,of course it had to go down with a few months of no news on assets , just about every investor and his dog would have known that" this is priceless... where were those wise words before the ipo ? your mates were telling you the share was going to rocket.. double digits..... you were happily swallowing such fanciful predictions. and now, captain hindsight is saying "of course it had to go down " priceless.

they weren't free. Stop kidding yourself. you are just getting back shares in a company that were previously held as one entity. And if you really think they are free..... tell me exactly how much value it has returned from your initial investment ? If the average CICC holder bought at 3p.... he/she is now sitting on >90% loss. If that pleases you... and telling yourself the shares were free.... then you keep yourself in that happy delusion. It may mask the discomfort knowing you are sitting on >90% loss. For someone who tells me I know nothing.. and then post such amateurish nonsense : ",CICG will know if gold is viable by digging a few test holes ,never know they may start pulling gold nuggets the size of golf balls" is cringe worthy at best. Forget gold balls..... goof balls more like All imho.

The RNS states they have done no DD of any substance. ... that's why have NO resource report of any kind They state what they need to do in order to find out whether it's worth exploring. As for gold mining experts... i suggest you look at Dr Cowley's tenure at two previous listed resource companies where he was the COO.... both shares collapsed >70% while he was there Once again... you think gold explorers are headed by directors that have no experience of the mining/exploration sector ? You think they are just upstarts just out of community college ? you think they are able to raise money from the city just because they were nice suites ? or do the funders want to see experience at the helm ? You do know CICG isnt the only company with so called resource experts ? Ask every shareholder of every resource company...they'll tell you exactly what you are crowing.. that their directors have years of experience and know their way round licenses. Do all of them discover any economical resource ? of course they dont.... vast majority fall flat. With a probability of 1000:1...... CICG being one of the successful companies is as rare as hens teeth.... imho (all imho)

aye up... its ayemesco i post because i can, i post my comments even though i dont hold because i wish to. It's of no concern of yours why i post. If you scan the terms and conditions, there is nothing in there that states 1) you have to have any financial interest in the stock in order to post 2) one has to give a motive to post in order to submit comments as there are no such conditions..... i can post as often as i wish. If that is bothering you.... tough.... thats the wonderful thing about freedom of expression... it can annoy a lot people who arent tolerant of opposing views. Tell you what.. use the filter button.. which youve claimed to have used so many times and even advised others to do the same... yet for some reason you force yourself to read my comments..... which is good in away as you must have realised how correct i have been with the share price. May be that is annoying you ? have a nice day.

here's a scenario If someone bought £9,000 worth of CICC @ 3p, say around 2 years ago, how do you think he's faring now ? £9,000 /£0.03 = 300,000 shares those shares are now in limbo - unbankable. but good news, that person also got 15% of his holding in CICG shares so how much is that worth ? 45,000 shares * 1.4p = £630 So after over 2 years, his £9,000 is practically worth £630.... When will the rest of the £9,000 be released..... ? well that's anyone's guess So on any metric.... after 2 years of waiting the so called investment has yet to deliver any sort of profit... in fact the investor is sitting on a 93% loss. This is the exact same scenario in absolute terms the rest of CICC investors are in.... for those who bought at around 3p......sitting on losses of > 90%...... if bought higher then even worse.