Member Info for The.Italian

No,dougie,i'm afraid not.cannot be 100% certain he received it,as he has always replied before.i'm not inclined to try again,as if he is deliberately not replying,a further enquiry won't achieve anything.just going to have to wait on formal news i think.

Discoman,i think you are correct.if you refer to the RNS of 13th sept 2022, you will see it refers specifically to the covid restrictive regime in china and that this prevented co-high from delivering on its obligations. fum stated they were trying to take steps to remedy the situation, but clearly these failed.not sure if there were any restrictions on riverwood selling during the agreement period,as ire call there were 2 or 3 changes in the holding after the agreement was announced, but i accept that it is very probable that they have been selling since it was formally terminated and the we may simply have to wait for that process to be completed. as an aside,i do not share the opinion of those who have criticised the bod for the failure of the co-high licence.it seems to have been an unfortunate consequence of covid,such as has adversely affected many investments.anyway,regardless of culpability,what seems more important now is the conclusion of a fresh licence for that area and i would reference the statement in the last RNS that there has been significant interest(my words)particularly following the FDA approval.i am therefore, hopeful (and confident) of very positive news here in due course.

I doubt the fall from IPO and post IPO has much relevance to most of the poster on here.

20th october last year,so perhaps soon.

Very interesting find,timkford.i had never heard of bidstats before. not looking to read too much into things, but encouraged to see a contract award, regardless of the value, as it suggests the awarder believes they will still be going to fulfil it. just my opinion.

I imagine it is more of a numbers game than a margin game.just my opinion.

The last formal notification from riverwood was the 4th may2021, from which we know they held 7m shares at that point and so were below reporting levels. the assumption that they have been the recent determined seller is a reasonable one, but it is only an assumption, not a known fact.

Im not going to list them all , but start with the 4th march 2021 and then the 1st april 2021 and the 15th april 2021. you will need to read a few of later ones as well (TR1s and conversion notices) to get the full picture.

Well i emailed jamie on tuesday,but as yet no reply.i'm disappointed as he has alway replied before,even if only to say he can't really add anything etc.of course there is a multiplicity of reasons why he might not have replied and im not 100% certain that his correct email is still as it was in the regent pacific days,but it looks as though it is based on the change of name back to regent announcement etc. anyway,I've had no bounce back, so im assuming it was received.i will evaluate whether to send a chaser after the weekend.

Yes ,the lock in period is a positive.in the event of a T/O before the exercise cut off there will doubtless be provisions to compensate etc. i really don't see anything unreasonable or untoward here at all.

£265k trade @53p earlier today.from s/p movement im guessing it was a buy. "o"trade.

Personally i don't have problem with the awards, as i think it aligns the directors' interests more closely with those of the company. my only qualification would be that the exercise price is pretty low, so slightly disappointed in that.

Dougie,i will email jamie tomorrow if no news in the morning(grandparents day today,so not much time)

Morning dosanddonts. fair point. let us hope they have learned from previous experiences.

It's true that they have got other products to market before, but i donot think any of them have had the partnerships and distribution backing which this has . imo it is of a completely different order.

Mickey mouse? really!

Clever,but depressing!

25th oct last year.no prior warning.

Very much doubt it,DRM72. the agreement with haleon gives them the right exclusively to commercialise the distribution of eroxon in the us.i assume it it is some form of opportunistic exercise by persons unrelated to fum.

Https://www.google.com/search?q=versarien+twitter&sca_esv=570661384&source=hp&ei=Om4dZfbMD8WbkdUP7eGAmAk&iflsig=AO6bgOgAAAAAZR18SsGfRRg_Hu4OP8O8ociEI-omDgGC&ved=0ahUKEwj20cGZxdyBAxXFTaQEHe0wAJMQ4dUDCAs&uact=5&oq=versarien+twitter&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhF2ZXJzYXJpZW4gdHdpdHRlcjIFEAAYgAQyBhAAGBYYHkibK1AAWOoncAB4AJABAJgBY6ABkQmqAQIxN7gBA8gBAPgBAcICERAuGIAEGLEDGIMBGMcBGNEDwgILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwHCAgsQABiKBRixAxiDAcICDhAuGIAEGLEDGMcBGNEDwgIIEAAYgAQYsQPCAgsQLhiKBRixAxiDAcICCxAuGIAEGLEDGIMBwgIEEAAYA8ICBRAuGIAEwgIIEC4YgAQYsQPCAhEQLhiABBixAxjJAxjHARjRA8ICCxAuGIAEGMcBGNEDwgIHEAAYgAQYCsICEBAAGIAEGLEDGIMBGEYY-gHCAhEQLhiDARjHARixAxjRAxiABA&sclient=gws-wiz.just in case anyone wants to read it.thanks for posting father elmer.