Member Info for The.Italian

Quite correct,fatherelmer.no problem in principle getting over the nominal value issue. ive been in a number of companies which have had to do it.

Under the original co-high licensing agreement riverwood high growth fund received certain convertible loan note and warrants.i won't recite the precise details of what they did with them,but the last relaible information we had was the RNS of 4/5/21 stating they had reduced their holding from 3.102% to 2.73%, totalling 7m shares. they may well have reduced further since then as the deal fell through and it would be a reasonable assumption to suggest they would sell down further following its failure. it is ,however,merely an assumption and nothing more.as they were below 3% in may 21,we will have had no statements of any dealings below that level. in case you are not clear, co-high was the licensee,but the shares were held by riverwood. both co high and riverwood are in effect owned by atlantis.

Thanks very much for that, trousers, appreciated. looks like we will know the options reasonably soon.

Interesting,1pencil.small in itself,but i think it serves to remind us of the potential benefit of a move to premium listing (or the amalgamation if that is the way it goes.) i think someone posted earlier questioning why any institutions would buy in at this point.well if we go premium,the trackers will have no choice,and i personally think this potential effect on a company with a fairly small free float is being greatly underestimated.

Ok dougie.i will leave it until next week,but if nothing by then i will email.obviously he won't say anything price sensitive,but he might just indicate the news is coming shortly,or something of that nature.he has always replied in fairness.

Agreed .really frustrating.i did toy with the idea of emiling jamie, but probably no point.

Or perhaps regent simply inhabits a parallel universe with its own time frame? who knows with this lot!.morning bignose.

Excellent news.futura have significant experience in patent applications, so im not surprised, but extremely good news to have this confirmed.

Https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/VRS/corporate-update/16147386

Sorry dougie.i must have missed your post. it is 40.2%. both google and stock screener give the same figure,40.2%.mellon and cohorts have the rest.hope this helpshttps://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+regent+pacific+group%27s+free+flot&sca_esv=569660528&source=hp&ei=eMEXZeeaEveChbIPk7KggA4&iflsig=AO6bgOgAAAAAZRfPiI94Dse2jBsHMS67liJ9GrmJ06K4&ved=0ahUKEwjntvfe29GBAxV3QUEAHRMZCOAQ4dUDCAw&uact=5&oq=what+is+regent+pacific+group%27s+free+flot&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6Iih3aGF0IGlzIHJlZ2VudCBwYWNpZmljIGdyb3VwJ3MgZnJlZSBmbG90MgcQIRigARgKMgcQIRigARgKMgcQIRigARgKSPa6AVAAWLe2AXABeACQAQCYAZIBoAGHGKoBBDQwLjG4AQPIAQD4AQGoAgrCAgsQABiABBixAxiDAcICERAuGIAEGLEDGIMBGMcBGNEDwgILEC4YigUYsQMYgwHCAgsQABiKBRixAxiDAcICEBAAGAMYjwEY5QIY6gIYjAPCAggQABiABBixA8ICBRAuGIAEwgIOEC4YgAQYsQMYxwEY0QPCAggQLhiABBixA8ICBBAAGAPCAgUQABiABMICCxAAGIAEGLEDGMkDwgIHEAAYgAQYCsICBhAAGBYYHsICCBAAGIoFGIYDwgIFECEYoAHCAgQQIRgVwgIIECEYFhgeGB0&sclient=gws-wiz

ThanksTDH. it did indeed!

The buybacks continue apace.i assume that the benefit of these will only be fully experienced when(hopefully not if)the cycle turns and bios once again become in vogue perhaps when interest rates turn and finance becomes less of a problem.

Are you suggesting that customers and consumers are ceasing to use THG's services and products because of moulding's posts in the same way as consumers stopped buying ratners products? i assume you are a tad more percipient than that.

Https://www.standard.co.uk/business/vultures-circle-over-uk-firms-where-bargains-are-to-be-found-m-a-ftse-stock-market-lseg-b1110362.html not specific to THG,but perhaps of general interest

Not really clear why you feel boarder and co were"clueless".pf course it was fortunate that the placebo results were as good as the trial drug(although that did of course mean that the drug failed its trial,so it cut both ways),but they then immediately seized the opportunity to go down the device route and successfully raised significant funds from LO (who have remained a firm supporter ever since ) to do so.the clueless board then successfully completed trails in both the EU and US.the requirements for a successful trial, even for a medical device, are highly exacting. im not suggesting that the current board is necessarily ideal to take things on to the next stage (i'm expecting a T/O at some point to enable LO to exit) but i do think some credit is due to it.and yes,im well aware of their less than glorious history before med3000.

Sipp!doh!

I have several accounts with HL (including a simp) and have always found them easy to use and very reasonable. i also have an account withhII to hold some non uk stock,where ,sadly, i have not had the same experience.

Morning bignose.i was wondering that,but the hang seng itself as only down less than 1.4%,so not sure.if evergrande goes into liquidation,which seems very liiely unless the chinese govt intervenes in a big way,it will have very wide and adverse consequences and one could perhaps expect a lot to local investors to liquidate positions in other stocks im afraid. anyway,our 13%f all was on about £10k volume (haven't done the maths but it is something like that) which emphasises how sensitive regent is to small volume trading.perhaps NDA news soon?

I've had a routine invite to participate in the zoom presentation tomorrow.i don't really do zoom ,so will be watching the recording later, which i'm sure they will put up after the event.if anything interesting i will report.

Afternoon trousers.very probably correct.from a personal perspective I've concluded that i would prefer a cash payment i lieu,even if it is at some discounted rate.i doubt i have the necessary facility to deal comfortably with the mechanics of a crypto payment.also i have a very small holding in my drawdown sipp (most were in my own and my wife's HL isas) and in light ion PGs comments earlier about possible tax consequences i would prefer a simple cash receipt.just my personal view of course.