Member Info for The.Italian

bald egale will just confine myself to agreeing that the very slight percentage variations seem to me,as a very non scientific layman,to show no statistical significance and therefore so far as i am concern med 3000 is as effective as med 2005.im glad you agree.

that makes sense Dtrade,thanks.

Bald Eagle he did indeed.you can still view it on website under investor centre/webcasts.it was on the 1st april.ive gone through it again but couldn't get a screenshot of the relevant section. there is a chart showing the comparative results of med3000 (the placebo as then was) against the three doses of GTN which were being tested. so far as i could see (i mean the litterally as my eyesight is not as good as it was and my screen is quite small )med3000 was superior or equivalent on all measures except one against the largest dose of GTN tested ,where it was a percentage point or so down. certainly nothing to suggest inferiority any meaningful sense. please have a look as it may be helpful (if anyone can take a screenshot it would be very helpful) i hope this post is accurate but a screenshot would put the matter beyond argument.i do agree with the water under the bridge comment ,although as i wasn't invested then i accept that that is easier for me to say than perhaps for some others.

sorry LF i don't understand your post but I'm sure i agree with it.almost time for my cocoa!

wayne don't get me wrong im a very big fan of melody as an investment.i have no metric to measure against but it just didn't seem very many.i do take the point that the majority may be viewing on phones.its a genuine question and if posters who know about and watch these things are happy that that is a reasonable figure I'm happy with that.good to hear that the quality of production is as good as i expected it would be.

thats exactly what i thought frnkmu.see below.

i hope I'm not looking at the right figures but it seems to be showing 1,223 people viewing you tube at moment.is this right? not a lot I'm afraid.hope I'm wrong.

bucolic if you wish to change my mind i must ask you to point specifically to where it is stated that med 2005 was proved to be more efficacious than med 3000 (the placebo as was). i cannot recall any statements to that effect.my understanding is that it was equally as efficacious and the fact that it does not contain an ingredient in med 20005 does not, in itself, detract from that efficaciousness. i do not ,despite appearances, have a closed mind.i simply do not think there has been any statement about med 2005 being more efficacious. if i am wrong and you can show me i will accept it. there is no merit in obduracy, as opposed to accuracy.

no bucolic i do not agree that med 3000 is an inferior product.i have seen nothing to suggest that it is.as it has the advantage of being able to seek approval as a device and as it it is a simpler formulation and thus cheaper potentially to manufacture, i regard it as superior in terms of potential marketability.also,with respect,i see no point in referring to historic events. they are just that,history.i am solely concerned with the present position not what has gone on in the past.my only question is how likely is this product to get approval.i have my own opinion.secondary questions may then arise as to how sales will pan out,what type of marketing deal is likely,but these are,so far as I'm concerned ,questions for a later date,and again.with respect,i attach no importance or value to your speculations in these areas.

dermasys!

bucolic i don't mind knowledgable discussion or even speculation although i completely ignore it. what does help though is a bit of consistency.on the 25th june at 15.10 you posted (inter alia) ''in the FM57 trial the placebo,durmasts, worked better than the medication being trailed, med2005" i fail to see how you can now suggest that it is inferior to the trialed product and thus second rate.

point 3 is the key imo.

about to start according to wireless twitter.no idea what it is.

well barder has said we can expect news on the cbd collaboration this month. could be interesting.

according to golden greek and other wireless has been featured on BBC london news tonight. i can't find it but assume its correct.

cureboy.sorry predictive text

agreecwith that curably. the problem here though seems to be that at the moment there is little to move the s/p up significantly. there doesn't seem be much buying interest from pis and it seems the institutions can acquire substantial amounts without pushing the price up.possibly we could get additional buying if we get a very positive trading update, but absent that, we may just sit here until whatever the master plan(assuming there is one)is revealed. that said the only thing that is certain on aim is that things never turn out as you expect, so anything could happen.overall though i agree that the situation is very positive.

thanks albert.how silly am i going to look when nothing happens!heres hoping.

well LF i think air i can say is the I'm hoping (and expecting)that we will get some very significant news fairly soon. it"s just speculation on my part, but melody must have something of substance lined up to follow wireless.could be completely wrong of course. incidentally i also hope for MGK next weekend as suggested to an earlier poster (sorry can't see it at moment)

my two deleted posts were simply a reference to the recent tweet about two cancelled festivals which in turn referenced MVR.i suggested we should watch this space.both were deleted almost immediately.i posted the second one as when i couldn't see the first one i assumed id had another jojo moment and pressed the wrong button,but apparently not. also the post to which i was responding about an article or something on SKY news re the music indistry's entreaty for help was also deleted. both posts made it clear it was just an opinion and could well be wrong.it probably isn't suspicious or significant at all, but it was odd, as to my mind there was nothing to warrant deletion.i have not put the names as i don't want this deleted but I'm sure you know what I'm talking about.