Member Info for The.Italian

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rise-of-the-vr-festival-how-covid-19-has-forced-gigs-to-move-online-lzcssggxl dont know if youvegot it yet but here it is.

agree with that ORLM.interesting figures re JoJo thanks.

perfectly possible YHAL and in my view quite likely.

clever

thanks A1EX.i don't really use social media at all so i tend just to look at twitter and ignore instagram hence my referncece to a few.glad to hear it has gone down ell on instagram as it was exactly my feeling that this was going to be the best received show so far. ive only seen the twitter clips but they do look very impressive.

looks like her show was an absolute smash from the twitter comments.not very many but all highly positive. codey just for the record i am not "raving" about her twitter posts.i am simply making the point that she has been more active in her promotion than some others which is a good thing.just because iand other posters take an interest in the tweets and numbers does not mean we are blindly and uncritically treating this as a sufficient end in itself. we are all completely aware ,I'm sure.,that at the end of the day this is a numbers game, but you need to look at the numbers to see where this is going, not ignore them. long way to go yet but thats why we have an s/p of 4p not 20p plus.maybe if you used language which did not try to give the impression constantly that your fellow posters are at best rather simple minded panglossian fools you might be taken more seriously.just my opinion of course

not sure i quite follow you there. if a third party were buying on behalf of Dbay it would still be incumbent on Dbay to report to the company as they would presumably be controlling the holding which i think is the criteria determining the reporting requirement. not absolutely sure that is correct, but even if that were not the case, the reporting obligation would presumably arise as soon as the holding was transferred, although the report might not be required for an extra day or so.sorry if I've misunderstood you and I'm certainly open to the possibility that it may be some form of concerted approach, but one which is loose enough to avoid the reporting obligation at this time.we are not in a bid situation (yet) so i dont think concert party regulations come into play, but nothing to stop parties joining forces or working to a common purpose in the future i imagine. however I'm certainly no expert on this type of thing so more than happy to hear alternative views.

thats the one A1EX thanks.

tweet 2hrs ago.9k views

agreed the skull.coverage continues on part of monday but i would expect wireless to announce line up,or at least some substantive teasers, at some point on monday.just my opinion of course.

YHAL I've no idea but looking more closely at the figures for the trades, each trade was for 2.647% of the issued capital, exactly the percentage by which Dbay increased. so clearly Dbay took all of one trade.what about the other? one explanation, of course, it that it is simply a duplication. this does happen occasionally and the same trade gets posted twice. another explanation is that another entity took it as a de novo holding, so no report required. there is a small time gap between the trades, so i would doubt it is a duplication, but it could be. probably we will never know,so this is just idle speculation. anyway something is clearly afoot, as the trading is clearly not random, with virtually no pi trades and virtually no s/p movement. time will tell.

yes and she tweeted again 13h ago .obviously quite active on social media so no doubt we will get another one before the show. original tweet has over 18k views. not huge but respectable.it all adds to the picture imo.

wouldn't argue with that backtoblack. personally i regard TPR as entirely peripheral ,just an added bonus if it comes good.its really all down to regulatory approvals for med 3000.if we get those then we will do very well.but as you say need to be patient and accept realistic time scales. barder does of course confirm quite positively that the timescales in that regard remain on track

thanks for that jupiter.these videos are of course heavily scripted and really just company promotional propaganda. that said i did find this one quite interesting in that it did explain the reason for the second pre submission fda meeting.it is quite correct that the approval process regime is very prescriptive with meetings limited to one hour in some cases so this need for a second meeting is not too surprising.overall barder is very positive which you would expect but personally i felt his demeanour was encouraging .the only negative for me was that he did not mention TPR 100,stating that next news would be on the CBD link up.however if the TPR process has ground to a halt i would have thought this would have to be announced to the market so am assuming this is still progressing as outlined previously.it does sound as though he is expecting to announce something reasonably positive about the cbd tie up (as otherwise why mention it and it was clearly set up for him to do so) although i may be reading too much into that. overall very happy with the video

morning professorZ.glad to hear you are out of quarantine and have got through this difficult time.not sure im the best person to update you but over the last 3 months we have had final results on 31st march(on website)which were,to put it mildly ,pretty awful. slow decline in s/p on very low volume generally.i think there was a spike 3 or 4 weeks ago but it didnt hold.then we had a trading update on18th june(on website).largely repeated previous information but is essential reading really as it contains quite lot of detail and update on FDA trial recruitment .unfortunately it contains what appears to be a glaring error about FDA timelines.anyway we have then had a spike on quite large volume,much more than for a long time. since then we have gone down and now back up again on modest volume ,but better than we were experiencing generally.so pleasing to see s/p up from its lows of a little while ago but no substantive positive news to support it.next news expected is update on ema application for change from RX to oct,expected i think by end of july.personally i think this is very important but not confident we will get it(although trading update did sound reasonably positive) if you read the t/u that will bring you up to date.happy to be corrected if anything I've said from memory is wrong or I've missed anything vital .

just one for those like me who believe in incremental growth not moon boots and rockets.we now have the first five slots on katelyn traver's you tube (was 4).new one released yesterday.only 1500 views so farbut it seems to me to demonstrate a kind of growth strategy.probably nothing significant but it all helps

sorry meant to change the header.i try not to do gratuitous or supercilious headers.

couple of largish delays publication trades reported after close.hopefully buys but you can never really be sure.gla

was announced on the17th october.it does not specify a period as such ,but states that a minimum number of subscribers is guaranteed "during the first 12 months" that suggests it was for longer than 12months, although it could for example be something which could be extended beyond the initial first 12 months, say by one party's option.without sight of the actual agreement we cannot really say,but obviously got a way to go yet.

35m 6,100 views