RE: Charge11 Jul 2020 22:13
mark@1973 MR05 if it's been released or the property the subject of the charge no longer belongs to the company.MR04 if it's been "satisfied".ive delved a little deeper (shows the folly of posting without looking at all the available information).if you refer to the RNS of 28th jan you will see it refers to a loan amendment and release agreement with hercules regarding certain actions which fully"satisfy" the conditions attached to the hercules agreement.the loan was made to MOTIF INC the us subsidiary.the charge now satisfied is the subsidiary agreement under which motif bio(our company)in effect pledged all its interest in Motif bio inc as security for the performance of the obligations under inc' loan agreement. the amendments in january effectively satisfied motif bios obligations under the hercules agreement but the notice of satisfaction has only now been registered at companies registry.thats my analysis,.imo it doesn't mean the loan has been repaid it simply means that motif bio's responsibilities in relation to it, which were released in january ,have now been formally recorded as satisfied.this would be consistent with the absence of an RNS as nothing has actually changed since 28th jan.what is interesting is the timing.why file it now/ok gold my not be very busy and is doing a bit of admin,but if motif is going to the wall why bother.for me it suggests tidying things up before the RTO announcement. i hope I'm right. all just my opinion of course.