Member Info for The.Italian

good man bucolic. i wonder if a "cesspit of derampers" could become some sort of collective noun,like a conspiracy of ravens,a murder of crows,a discovery of witches and a murmuration of starlings? hope I've got those right as doing it from memory.that aside and on a purely peripheral note is anyone invested N4P/im not but it has just got notification of intention to grant a patent from the european patent office ,for its silica nanoparticle delivery system (no I've no idea what it is).s/p has been on a pretty stiff upward projection for some time now and spiked on the patent news.not suggesting any parallels with fum,just interesting. also in light of the current CBD feeding frenzy ,can we expect an update on the CBD tie in here? it's a very fair question about the TPR100 situation and i wonder if fum are waiting forthe feb FDA meeting before updating on all aspects.just musing and of ocurse I'm now waiting for all the arguments about how the N4P news shows how poorly fum have performed etc,which i shall then duly ignore as completely irrelevant to what happens in the future,good or bad.

my recollection is that it is the ticker for the shares on the OTC market in US.it was was the source of considerable unfounded speculation some time ago.best to ignore it imo.happy to be corrected if I'm wrong.

N4P results out soon.last year 25th feb.i don't know if a date has been given (i think not but not certain),so people will be taking a view now.hold for results, get out in case results disappoint,or get in before results in case it spikes.you pays your money etc.

Interesting to see that Napster was streaming Taylor Swift's re-recorded version of Love Story yesterday, which was a big music news item on Thursday. I suppose you would expect it to be doing so, as presumably all the major streamers were, but it does give an indication perhaps, of the potential reach, which the service could have if it can be grown effectively.

and only 8 trading days until the name change meeting.now logically a name change in and of itself, shouldn't really give rise to a change in s/p.it will still be the same company.that said i think there is a slightly different dimension to this change. adopting an iconic name, even if the iconoclasm has long since ceased to have any relevance, may have a psychological impact and could well lift our profile. note the several articles referring (however inaccurately) to napster listing on aim on 25th.that seems to be the focus of interest. on a purely personal note.i have never been the keen on melody as a name.ive posted before the announcement of the napster deal that i felt melody was too "nice".i think the harder edge of napster is much more appropriate to a hopefully hard hitting innovative company.just a purely personal opinion,which many will not share.also i expect further news before the 25th which may,if I'm correct,give the name change itself a bit of a tailwind.pure speculation of course,

had a look now at your sept 2019 post 5Orrell on SXX and you are spot on.a bit uncanny really but I'm afraid i still don't attribute any significance to it personally.i really cannot see anyone wanting to acquire mvr at this stage.anyone potentially interested is going to want to wait to see how things develop and what revenue etc can be generated. too many unknown at the moment imo. obviously i could be wrong and it's just my opinion.let us hope it's just a coincidence and nothing more.

understood 5Orell.my post was perhaps a little more peremptory than usual and was not intended to be quite so dismissive as it came across.i had already seen the big gib post,which i assumed was just tongue cheek.is he really close to mvr or just likes to come across as such?.ive no idea but he has long been a vociferous promoter of mvr.thanks for the reference t o your posts and i will be having a look later

doubt the numbers are remotely significant.they are just the number of shares you end up with on£20 or £10 buys.

silica nanoparticle delivery system! i always worry when i read about nanoparticles. sounds dangerous stuff to me.only joking(mostly) as i have zero understanding of it.obviously if it works and more importantly is safe then it will be very beneficial and good luck to them.

yes been watching that bignose.they had a spike at beginning of dec i think and then back down.now back up again.i didn't know they had an ed product at one time. im still in FUM awaiting news (they are also awaiting a patent approval).apologies for off topic.

agree with that Dosanddonts.

perhaps of some slight tangential interest,re twitter and subscription modelshttps://www.hl.co.uk/news/2021/2/11/twitter-may-turn-toward-a-subscription-or-tipping-model-to-enhance-revenue

new year not newer

thanks heimdal.understood.im not sure about this, but 900+ actually seems like a lot for this type of thing,which i gather is your take also.lets see what the newer brings.GLA

heimdal thanks for the posts.do you know what the article is saying? is it just a commentary on the trial approval news?thanks

some fairly chunky buys over last couple of days.may not mean anything of course,but mildly encouraging.

very fair comment bunco.i have assumed that it is a new strategy and the RNS seems to suggest this,but i may be wrong and i certainly agree it could and should have been clearer.

hope you are right mel.as i mentioned earlier i actually bought some more today (not something i was planning to do) but the disconnect between s/p and what i perceive as value, is just too compelling to ignore. just my opinion of course.

i do note that han**** mentions live nation expressly twice in his interview piece. probably not significant but just saying.

dougie not sure we can add anything to the 4th jan announcement that the p11 has been competed and regent were on track to submit results to FDA during first half of 2021.bearing in mind how important the formulation of the results submission is and the care required, i am personally going to assume that it will take until the end of the first half 2021 and if it is any earlier i will be pleasantly surprised. i assume that when the results are submitted they will be disclosed to the market at the same time, perhaps in headline form, but i may be wrong. probably reasonable to assume that good results will be disclosed sooner rather than later but even that is not certain. just reflecting on human nature.