Member Info for TerrorWit

"Feeks

Posts: 4,972

Price: 44.70

No Opinion

RE: This board's been busy! Is it time?5 Jan 2023 10:59

There was one patent trial case I spotted where the disagreement was settled very soon after the verdict. This was presumably something which suited both parties as it would mean an up-front payment to the wronged party and the avoidance of further lengthy appeals where the final amount of damages and license fee would remain uncertain. 

At the point a verdict is reached the damages award is crystallised. Samsung will be motivated to settle to avoid a big multiplier where the jury has also confirmed wilful infringement. This might suit Nanoco too. Let's say, for example $750m is awarded in damages on the basis of wilful infringement and Samsung appeals in the hope this is reduced to less than $500m on appeal. Nanoco's potential damages therefore range between $750-$2.25bn. 

There will be a delay whilst the judge decides what multiple to impose and whether to set the future license fee.

In the above scenario $1bn with that money paid immediately certainly might be attractive to both sides. Nanoco assures its future and Samsung notionally "saves" $1.25bn. That's what I think is mostly likely to happen - a deal soon after the jury verdict - because Samsung may not realistically hope to stretch this out forever for its own advantage if it loses at this trial. But let's wait and see....."

______

That doesn't look good in retrospect and there were hundreds of similarly naive posts from Feeks and Henry despite attempts by some to keep their feet on the ground.

Or perhaps I'm completely in control of my life and a happy, successful, autonomous individual who doesn't need to answer to anyone but themselves because I've done the work to get there.

It's just trollish dribble NGR. They live their whole lives trying to provoke discussion on this board. If we ignore them they'll just keep poking us both in the eyes until they get the gratification of a response. All they want is to be taking seriously as individuals here because they aren't validated anywhere else.

Thank you NGR

If Pb was really an issue in any device at the nanoscale volumes contained in the materials Nanoco sold to STM it could never have been validated.

It's seems only you and I can keep our heads screwed on today. I would say that, as usual, there are a lot of hollow insinuations being thrown around that have no basis in evidence or fact. I'm sure that the majority of holders, who most likely never comment, will see straight through all that.

It's just a slight slippage otherwise the messaging would have said. Happens every day.

Bunch of drama queens who shouldn't be allowed near a pair of scissors (not NGR).

Since I'm allegedly so unintelligent it will surprise you to learn that my view has been validated by Edison this morning

https://www.edisongroup.com/research/visibility-pushed-back/33783/

Crude comments about my intelligence from people who spend their whole waking lives complaining publicly about the shares in which they say they're invested will never trouble me.

You're merely tiny-minded bullies who need proper lives.

Says the one who's posted the same joke 15,000 times without twigging it isn't funny.

Oh no! Troublesome's hemorrhoids have learned to type.

Good Morning! The sun's shining and I'm so ready to go vote and look forwards.

Meanwhile, please may I politely suggest that you continue re-living your mistakes so exposing your jealousies, pettiness and plain ignorance because that's just what the world needs right now.

Thank you all in advance for your generous efforts.

I'm awarding that attempt 1 out of 10.

To cheer us all up I propose a competition to see who can write the funniest fake cliché. One that's even funnier than any of the 15,000 or so written by Troublesome. To start things off, here's mine

You can't buy the blind unicorn an orange in the fish market.

Obviously, it's not very good compared to the high standards we're all used to but what else is there on this forum?

So, to recap.

So far as I can see very little has changed except that the nasty anonymous narrators here and on LSE have had an enjoyable two days knocking people they don't know where they can't answer back.

It's all upside down and cowardly, especially when all that's happened is that a small, anticipated order has slipped beyond the end of the FY, which is less than a month away.

It's a long term investment in a new platform technology with multiple applications with an expert team supported by genuinely impressive NEDs.

If you can't wait or don't like it you know what to do. Whinging, bed-wetting and arguing in public all day whilst hiding behind cowardly nicknames in places where the company can't answer you and most likely isn't listening will achieve less than zero.

What a pathetically infantile post Troublesome. Why does a man like you, who hasn't had a mortgage for thirty years, behave like a toddler who's lost Blanky?

_______

From the RNS no-one can say anything other than STM have sufficient Gen1 materials until the end of the month. Everything else that has been written on this forum today is a guess.

I don't know how you can possibly think it's been canned at all. Far more likely STM are waiting for upstream orders since their customers are still in development and they still have some of the first order in stock.

Have any of you ever worked in engineering design, manufacturing or production engineering? If you had you would appreciate that this as all entirely normal and there's no need to panic.

This forum is almost total muppetry in my my view

I think you're catastrophising a simple delay by extrapolating too far into the future to the point where it's meaningless since so much can change in either direction in 2-3 years anyway.

At this stage all we know is the an anticipated order for Gen 1 materials, which was never going to be very large anyway has been postponed to a later date. This type of thing happens in most businesses every day. I fail to understand why it justifies so much melodramatic commentary unless it's because people over-invested short term money.

Did you over-invest money you needed for something else Kooba?

"Those who bought on that note last week that the company signed off on should be asking questions on the timing."

--------

No. It proves that Edison work only on public information.

You can write what you like about me. All it proves is that you haven't got anything on point.

I'm an engineer, architect, published author and magazine columnist who's worked around the world and who recorded a series of political documentaries as a journalist and reporter .... for BBC one.

Now what's your CV?