Member Info for Teacup64

Oh, someone's deleted his post, well that was a pointless 10minute write up then, lol ;)

Crying inside?!?....not really, lol. In hindsight, had I known it would drop after, I would have sold and then bought again. But because I didn't and couldn't have known this back then, I would still be here waiting for the original reason that I invested, the SWP. I notice that you like to throw that "crying inside" phrase into many of your posts. HINT: Try not using the same phrases so often. If you want it to appear to the outside world that shareholders are suffering, when they are in fact not, using phrases like "crying inside", or similar, should be used sparingly. This way, outsiders who read a particular board will psychologically interpret weakness and defensiveness when valid responses by genuine shareholders are given, no matter how correct the shareholders may actually be. To over saturate the use of such phrases, will result in the opposite psychological effect, and can sometimes risk unveiling the bigger plan that operates behind the curtain. Anyways, think smart, don't expose your flag!

Irene, that's highly critical considering that he said he was no expert. Of coarse, it could have been executed better....that's the beauty of hindsight. Amongst the many questions he had, I'm certain it's very easy to not slip up and follow through to obtain a more definitive answer. Given the time that readers of that question have had to analyse and break it down, it's easy to then become a critic, but it doesn't lessen Offermans contribution. It's the same reason that online firms continously pump out updates and patches, because it's far easier to dismantle a secure system, than it is to secure one. In other words, whatever is constructed, whether it's questions, or secure networks, the outside world has plenty of time to analyse for vulnerabilities....as you have demonstrated. But for reassurance, LLL said it was 11"...or was that what he said was the diameter of thestop valve on the pump filter mechanism?

Hi Faz, it's posted this morning under Peter's name.

Tell me about it. I'm now thinking about saving time and data by not bothering with the video when it becomes available ;)

Thanks for updating LSE Peter, as I was unable to sign up an account on ADVFN to read what Offer an had written. Offerman - Excellent questions and a brilliant read! ...The earthquake and more oil......potentially greater than $500b.....Waterflood charging wells nicely.......top points for cheering up what is otherwise a very shit day in the SW ;)

...Teacup asking the hard questions and all that! Hoping to see them all posted along with the rest of the questions on the website.

Pffft....a ramper, lol, he doesn't know what he's talking about! Anyways folks, for the more rationally minded, I heard that BP, Uzbekistan and Petrotrin are in a huge and secret bidding war to obtain the Goudron field from us....best buy in before you miss it....BOOM!.....[image of an explosion][image of a rocket][another image of a rocket]

Glad someone knew where I was going with it....y ^ i (x) to you too ;)

Ummm...not sure where you got that I'm one of the rampiest rampers! ....unless of course, you're twisting the truth again to make it appear that you're statement has validity, so you can continue slamming the companies 'short term' prospects? Anyway, enjoy you're game ;)

I'll tell you what, I watched a brilliant documentary last night on BBC4 at 10pm about maths. Without going into historical or mathematical detail, it describing how someone had invented the number i, as a way of getting rid of added/unwanted/irrelevant/unused numbers in a calculation due to a mathematical flaw. Anyways, they decided to call this number 'i' an imaginary number, and it made me ask myself....I wonder how many users on the board today have 'i' number of shares? As this data is unknown, and hard to obtain in accuracy, I have invented the number 'u' to resolve this matter. Now, to work out how many shareholder on this board have 'i' number of shares, we can conclude this by using the following formula: u = i * i

If you want to switch from team Goudron, to team SWP, just throw on a purple shirt, no one's judging.

Just open your eyes a little wider my friend, you might realise that most of us aren't here for yesterday, or 6 months ago, but for SWP. As much as you may like to twist that fact to suit your narrative, nothing has changed. Feel free to make a quick buck here and then by distorting the truth, by make sure you don't miss any of the SWP discoveries...you'd be kicking yourself!

Holy shit! Fishsheds, you worried me then, for a moment, I thought I'd missed what we'd been ramping for. Pheww!

"All rampers should take off their blinkers" .....have I missed SWP? ....what year is it?

Lol, whoever it was, someone had to be at the receiving end of that typo ;)

Drunks = drinks

Lol, chicken nugget divi's ;) ....but it sounded like a good event, food, drunks and all that. And there's me thinking people just sit at these meetings listening and asking stuff....sounds more like it was a full blown three course meal, chatting and everything else. Did you have to register/apply or whatever, or was it simply just turn up?

"Something amiss here" .....patience maybe? I'm still up, so your concerns don't bother me as much.

Ah right, good to meet you...digitally.