Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
4FXSake, Swazers has 700 + subscribers and is interested in PREM, one of the worst performing stocks on AIM (and that is not exactly a recommendation) so make of it what you will but IMHO, not a positive vote for NFX, much though I wish it were
Before shouting 'Let's go nuclear' from the roof top, please take few minutes to reflect on its inherent dangers as well as its predictability and convenience. If Fukashima, Three Mile Island, Seascale (Windscale as was) and now the enormous threat and risk regarding Zaporizhzhia has taught us anything it is that we are playing with a potentially deadly and toxic technology.
I am no luddite but the world has already had sufficient warning of the dangers inherent in nuclear. Do you seriously think it is worth the risk when other (perhaps less convenient) solutions are out there?
Like Daisan, it confounds me as to why the UK does not invest at least a small percentage of its 'green energy' budget in tidal power - which represents a massive amount of predictable energy flowing around our shores each day. Just think, one cubic metre of seawater weigh one ton: how much potential energy is lost the with the daily rise and fall of tides.
When people say that nuclear is green, what they really mean is that one day it may actually turn you green, just before you expire.
It's a shame that the bod do not put as much energy into running the company for the benefit of shareholders as all the posters on this BB: if they did we would be flying in to the blue yonder rather than crashing into the dust. But what do I know, I was mug enough to invest here in the first place.
With the polio virus detected in London sewage - the recent case should give us all pause for thought as to the necessity of real time water monitoring and the potential for water monitoring devices. Was Deepverge technology involved I wonder?
I appreciate that some don't like it but nonetheless interesting to note that AUGM continues buying its own shares!
Hi EM 64,
I made a multi- bagger with Argo, ut I got in early (2019). \For what its worth I would advise against going all in on crypto! Diversify, diversify, Defiversify. Yes, you can win big with crypto but you can also lose big time. Try spreading your bread upon the water. Better still, unless you are a financial genius, just invest in a simple tracker, and remove the element of pain. Yes, I know they say no pain, no gain but even with a multi-bagger like Argo, I still seated and now prefer to take the less stressful route. GLA.
PS: I am still invested with KR1 (and AUGM, still some in Argo) but my intention is to switch to a tracker as soon as may be. Of course, I HODL my actual crypto.
If PW wants to see off the shorters he has the RNS weapon in his hand: just publish a full disclosure RNS detailing all the expenditure around the Texas purchase, what was paid for and what it cost (will cost). Much more reassuring than a You Tube video that is thin on content, including the dates on which DNS contingent acquired their shares. Simples.
The devil is in the detail.
For those investors who wish to make up their own minds about the pros and cons of the Batman report it can be downloaded for free from: https://theboatmancapital.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Argo-Blockchain-090821_.pdf
An interesting news item in MiningMx which heralds good news here: https://www.miningmx.com/top-story/46474-upping-self-generation-threshold-to-100mw-shows-sa-govt-is-up-for-it-says-anglo-boss/
I fear that it is the drip, drip effect over an extended period. A positive post is put out there and although consciously we file it under rubbish, at a sub-conscious level it is perhaps chipping away at our scepticism and predisposes to a more open mind-set the next time we look at a stock. May such a***holes rot in their own vomit.
A bit of exploration of the internet might be a good starting point. Just Google David Lenigas and see what comes up.
Simples . . . and basic
DYOR