Razor as you should well know traders and short term investors give liquidity long term holders and institutions give stability. Not divulging to the market overcapacity is an opportunity missed and only communicating debt/ dilution and delay is sending the sp one way.
and the result of that is people have sold out, if they did have the piece of mind H&W was doing ok (treading water) I strongly believe they would not have sold out, IF it was put in an rns I definitely would not have reduced my holding. apologize for too many if's but it is where we are.
droderick yes but all outgoing bar Judith and AGM, when there is clearly things that actually bring money in that could be communicated. I am not complaining of the lack of communication (actually think INFA is quite good) but the missed opportunities (ref 119% of capacity). I am 100% certain in time this will turn but would have felt more comfortable having an RNS regarding the 119% of capacity at H&W. I would rather this not be a shorters stock but feel it is going to be if not carefull.
Razor- Sitting on £50k-£100k+ losses and we are only getting negative to neutral communications when there is positives to share is not cricket, SP should be one of the board's primary objectives, and any opportunity should be seized.
Mr T, I agree with what you are saying, But a progress report after only 44 days stating " we are having to employ contractors to help as too much work" would be deemed as a very positive for the sp and perception and it is sentiment that drives AIM. AIMHO