Member Info for Svend

ShareFlyer, absolutely not.

A stock split changes nothing fundamental — it’s just slicing the same pie into more pieces. It might attract retail enthusiasm, sure, but serious institutional capital—the pension funds, sovereign wealth, hedge funds, BlackRocks of this world—aren’t allocating into penny-priced tickets. Their mandates often require minimum price thresholds—typically $15 to $20 per share—before a stock even gets on the radar.

Why? Because low-priced stocks signal volatility, illiquidity, and often lower-quality governance. Big money flows into price-confirmed strength, not into artificially diluted optics.

So no, you don’t want a 4-for-1 split. You want the stock to climb, consolidate, attract institutional interest, and earn its price the hard way—through real growth, not gimmicks.

PS. If you do not stay in your cabin, I may have to ask the crew to escort you off the plank!

''NTC prediction was incorrect, he said bang on 8th February for £7 so was wrong.

Wrong is wrong…''

Your statement reflects your personality, all confirmed in the comment ''2026 for£ 11''. What a bloody clown comment—12-month wide target and no reason why or when you need to man up or go back down to your cabin below deck before the rest of the crew don’t serve you as fodder for the sharks.

Peakdread, a pleasure as always, shipmate — and don’t worry, a bit of Googling with a strong brew tends to make the charts more palatable! Glad the next level targets caught your eye — the technical winds are favourable, but aye, those external squalls (especially the orange variety) are always worth keeping an eye on.

Let’s hope the next leg north is charted on data and demand, not drama and detours.

Always follow the path of least resistance, steady as she goes! 🙌😉999

Peakdread, If Rycey breaches the 939p level — which has acted as a key resistance and magnet zone — the next measured move targets can be derived from both technical pattern projections and psychological and volume cluster zones. Here's a structured breakdown:

📍Reference Point

Breakout Level: 939p

Last Base Range: ~867p–939p

Range Height: 72p

🎯Measured Move Targets Initial Measured Move:

Target = 939 + 72 = 1,011p → This puts the first measured move firmly into the £10.11 zone, just past the psychological £10 mark.

Secondary Fibonacci Extensions: > 1.272 Extension of the 72p base = 939 + (72 × 1.272) ≈ 1,031p > 1.618 Extension = 939 + (72 × 1.618) ≈ 1,056p

Psychological & Volume Cluster Zones:

£9.99–£10.00: Strong psychological resistance (sell walls likely)

1,030–1,050p: Likely where major funds reassess exposure or re-enter

1,100–1,140p: Historical resistance (2018 zone), and long-term Fib target from the post-COVID uptrend

📌Summary of Key Targets After 939p Break:

Target Level Method Notes

1,011p Measured Move Conservative base breakout

1,030–1,050p Fib Extensions Acceleration zone

1,100–1,140p Historical Long-term resistance + Fib confluence

DYOR - GLA - Enjoy the voyage

The momentum is for the price action to move beyond the 939 resistance. It's failed 3 times so far, maybe the 4th is going through now😉🙌999

ShareFlyer Ah, the clown horns are blaring again, I see — always loudest from the cheap seats.

No need to thank me for the free entertainment, but let’s correct the circus facts: Peakdread never made a recommendation, just shared his outlook — unlike some who heckle from the sidelines without so much as a position or a clue.

As for “pumping and dumping,” you’re giving me far too much credit. I’m flattered, but I assure you, my trades don’t move markets, though your emotions seem to.

Now, unless you're ready to back your bark with a chart, a thesis, or even a basic grasp of market dynamics, I suggest you grab some popcorn and enjoy the ride like everyone else.

🎪 Exit’s that way, champ.

*Tick

The close above 929.40 was just tea leaves magnificent, Fib 0.764 to the trick! (@932.29)

https://stocktwits.com/symbol/RYCEY

Enjoy the Voyage

Nettles, Ah, kind words from a noble crewmate — no need to hold the paws up too high, we all chart our course by different stars. What matters is we're still sailing together, eyes on the horizon and tails high. Onward to fairer winds and fatter fortunes! 🐾⚓📈

Nettles, Aye, the ol’ sandbag shuffle — a classic manoeuvre worthy of an Oscar and a CFO with a poker face! If they're indeed stashing treasure in the bilges for Q1, then your £8 fallback may end up as useful as an anchor on a lifeboat.

Keep yer spyglass steady, mate — December might just bring fireworks, not flotsam. 🎆📦💼

Aye aye, $13 be a charmed waypoint on this voyage! But set yer compass true, for 'tis the $15 to $20 waters where the turbo thrusters roar to life, and this mighty vessel blasts forth with no turning back. Brace the sails — we ride the storm to glory! ⚓🔥📈

thank you, peakdread— i appreciate the thoughtful message. you're 100% right that strong fundamentals are aligned in rolls-royce’s favour at the moment: we’ve got improving margins, strong order books, exposure to secular tailwinds (aviation rebound, defence, and nuclear), and increasingly positive institutional sentiment. that’s a powerful ****tail.

as for the charts, the reason i sometimes temper bold predictions with “it could go the other way” isn’t to hedge bets, but to remain disciplined in the face of probabilities, not certainties. technical analysis isn’t about crystal-ball certainty; it’s about recognising when conditions are favourable and when risk is increasing. for example:

support/resistance zones show where buying or selling historically occurs. if price fails to hold support (say 912), that suggests buyers are drying up, not necessarily due to poor fundamentals, but perhaps due to broader market fear or short-term profit-taking.

volume spikes or momentum divergences (e.g. price rising while rsi stalls) often suggest exhaustion, not reversal per se, but a sign to stay alert.

and yes, macro shocks — the “black swans” — can override even the cleanest setups. charts won't predict what will happen, but they often show how the crowd reacts to it.

so when i say “it could go the other way,” it’s not doubt — it’s risk management. we deal in odds, not absolutes. think of it like sailing: even with the wind behind us, you still check the barometer, trim the sails, and keep an eye on the horizon.

always happy to unpack the tools and methods more if you're curious — the only pay grade that matters here is your curiosity.

enjoy the voyage😉🙌999

This mornin’, the ol’ price dropped anchor at 909.60 — just a whisker below the sacred 0.618 Fibonacci tide line sittin’ at 910.12, charted from yesterday’s low port of 898.20. A bold dip, no doubt, sendin’ ripples through the short-term waters. The 10-minute spyglass now shows the sea stirrin’ — momentum may be settin’ sail.

Yesterday, high waves came crashin’ in at 929.40 — a peak to mark on the chart as the crow’s nest scans for a fresh breakout. Keep a steady hand on the tiller, lads — the next wave could chart our course true north or send us broadside.

Aye aye! We've broken formation and are now cruising through the stratosphere — 999 was just the runway, lad. Next stop: Mach £11 and afterburners armed for the double-digit dimension! 🔥🛫

Reminds me of the price action on Rycey this morning, which dipped down to 909.60 and is now back above 920 before the measured move up to 930s. Meanwhile, the combined estimates from analysts are forecasting a Price Target of 938.78. Enjoy the journey 😎🙌999

Peakdread, Aye aye, Chief — looks like we’re strappin’ into the afterburner and punching through the next stratocumulus layer of gains! With China and Emirates possibly sendin’ in orders the size of small GDPs, a narrow body announcement on the radar, and SMRs getting sprinkled like nuclear seasoning — I’d say we’re not just taking off... we’re breakin’ the sound barrier in a tuxedo. Buckle up, the next altitude is measured in altitude tax brackets.

ShareFlyer,

One piece of advice is this: As Kenny Rogers famously said, "You gotta know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em, know when to walk away, and know when to run.''

Now beat it 🤣

ShareFlyer

''I bet none of you earn over £30k in your day jobs… it shows! Anyway… Back to RR!''

Ah yes, the classic flex — measuring intelligence, conviction, and portfolio returns with a payslip.

Tell you what, let’s compare portfolios, not paychecks.

Some of us backed RR at 70p, not because we earned more, but because we knew more.

Now… back to Rolls-Royce — where the only thing flying higher than the engines is the share price.

Trello, yes, it's a potential breakout in progress if the 908/913 area can act as support; then there's scope or room for further immediate advances towards the high 930s in a relatively short order. 🙌🚀999

Ahoy there, loyal scout of the Nettles Dinghy — your dispatch is received and logged in the Captain’s logbook!

You’re quite right — the Rycey dividends keep the rum flowing, and there’s no plan to abandon ship just yet. But I hear you loud and clear on diversifying the treasure chest — I’ve got an eye on ATYM, AAZ, and a splash of HE1 myself.

Sometimes it pays to have a few sturdy pickaxes alongside the jet engines, just in case the winds shift. Rest assured, we sail this fleet together — wings, wheels, and a pickaxe or two in the hold.

Fair seas ahead, and my thanks for keeping a weather eye open. Always my trusted shipmate!

— Captain Svend