Member Info for Svend

Rycey is trading hands at $17.63

That's funny gas😃 pedal to the metal

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8LUd51IuiA

Retirment,

If it were that simple, we’d all plug numbers into Excel and retire by Tuesday.

Numbers don’t “match” the share price — they meet expectations (or don’t).

That gap between what was priced in and what turned up is where the move happens.

Otherwise, every stock would trade like a calculator with a ticker symbol 😄

Someone (Mr Market) is getting excited now that the 7000 mark is within reach in the short term.

Retirment,

You’re conflating price reaction with risk creation — they are not the same thing.

Results day does not introduce new fundamental risk; it reveals whether expectations embedded in the price were justified. If the valuation is genuinely supported by forward cash flows, margins, and execution milestones, the risk already existed before the numbers — the market simply reprices once uncertainty is removed.

Using Microsoft as an example actually reinforces the point. A double-digit drop on “good” results doesn’t mean risk suddenly appeared that morning; it means expectations were stretched relative to what was delivered. That’s valuation compression, not new risk.

As for trimming 50% “to hedge” — that’s a positioning choice, not risk management. It reduces exposure, yes, but it doesn’t change the underlying business risk or valuation logic. It just introduces timing risk and behavioural bias. If the thesis is intact, partial selling is simply an admission of uncertainty about price, not fundamentals.

Results day is a truth serum.

It doesn’t create risk — it exposes whether the risk was mispriced.

Spinner,

Markets don’t test your ability to predict results — they test your ability to stick to a process.

If your original investment case still holds and your risk is properly sized, then short-term volatility ahead of the results is just noise, not a signal. If the position is too large to sit through a binary event, that’s usually a sizing issue rather than a market one.

So the decision isn’t really hold vs sell — it’s whether your thesis has changed and whether you’re comfortable carrying risk into a known catalyst—different answers for different portfolios, time horizons, and objectives.

Results day doesn’t create risk — it simply reveals whether it was already there.

😂 Touché, fair critic.

“Guilty as charged on RYCEY — perfectly sound after-hours spyglass usage, no argument there. As for the pompous AI pirate speak… consider it optional seasoning. Some like salt, some like pepper, some accidentally summon a captain with a wooden leg and a Bloomberg terminal.

I’ll try to keep the parrot on standby and the ego below deck… but no promises if the wind picks up.” 🏴‍☠️📉

Deal?

Hi Charley,

😂 Ahem — adjusts captain’s hat, peers over the bridge.

“Ah, sharp eyes on the horizon! RYCEY is merely the American ticker flag flying over the same noble vessel — Rolls-Royce, HMS Engineering Marvel. Same engines, same tea, different port of call.

I quote RYCEY because that’s where the charts shout loudest and the cannons (liquidity) fire daily. RR on the LSE is the home port; RYCEY is the transatlantic outpost.

Do I live in America? Negative. Do I occasionally trade via American waters? Aye — purely strategic, no infestation reported.

Now then… back to scanning the markets. Engines steady, dividends to flank speed.” 🫡⚓️

Just curious questions answered, Captain out.

My apologies to the faithful RYCEY readers for my posting of other tickers than RYCEY. I just felt compelled to stop this nonsense about M&S Outbeating Rycey in the short/middle term, no chance, I say!

Retirment,

For an investor seeking stability and market dominance in 2026, Tesco PLC presents a more resilient proposition compared to Marks & Spencer (M&S). While M&S has shown impressive long-term recovery, it currently faces significant operational headwinds following a major cyber attack in late 2025 and early 2026 that has impacted its online division and squeezed near-term margins. In contrast, Tesco has achieved its highest UK grocery market share in over a decade (28.7% to 29.4%) and has upgraded its profit guidance for FY2026.

AZ,

AI at hyperscale eventually needs firm, always-on power — and nuclear (especially SMRs) is one of the few scalable answers.

Retirment. If income is the objective, exposure should be aligned with proven market leaders. RYCEY fits that profile more clearly than speculative alternatives.

In UK food retail, Tesco leads on market share, market capitalisation, and dividend sustainability. Marks & Spencer continues to operate under structural margin pressure from rising costs and third-party charges.

Dow Jones Industrial Average hits record 50,000 points

Yes, and it's currently trading at $ 16.94 in the USA at the moment, up 3.80% on the day

Countdown: 14 Days - VIX spiking above 20, hitting 23.1

Rycey is in a strong trend, pausing, compressing, and frustrating people.

Markets don’t usually reverse from:

* Rising weekly MAs,

* Shallow pullbacks,

* Defended higher lows.

They reverse after distribution.

The tea leaves show absorption.

Bias over the next few weeks:

➡️ Sideways first, then directional — with the higher-probability exit being up, not down.

Enjoy the voyage

IITK, Thanks for reaching out. Watching the volatility in Silver, it's gone from parabolic to Bananas, all while Mr Market is trying to stay airborne north of 6750/6800

A17, Don’t worry — the charts aren’t being consulted, they’re being observed.

Predictions get explained when facts change, not when emojis appear. Until then, the candles will do the talking… not the crystal ball 😄📈

Rolls-Royce signs TotalCare agreements with China Airlines for 36 Trent XWB engines: 4 February 2026

Agreements for 36 Trent XWB engines that will power 15 Airbus A350-1000 and three A350-900 aircrafts

Reuters

Berny, no worries, sorry, but not into cars at all.🤷‍♂️

Hi Berny,

This means price remains above the IKH clouds and the 50/150/200 SMA, on the daily tealeaves, the trend remains up. Simple as that.

Price has retraced to the former resistance level at 1235, which has now transitioned into a support zone. This level is further reinforced by the confluence of the 150 EMA on the 10-minute timeframe.

Before this retracement, price action formed a double bottom in the 1192–1195 region, followed by a double-top formation near 1262, aligning with the 0.236 Fibonacci retracement of the broader move.

Overall market structure remains constructive, with short-term bullish continuation favoured following the bullish crossover of the 50, 150, and 200 SMAs above the 1220 area.