Member Info for Svend

Iamhoping > In that case, I must be an AI agent😎

“Luck”? Oh no — I don’t use luck. I simply acknowledge it the way a seasoned sailor acknowledges the wind.

In trading, preparation sets the sails, analysis charts the course… and what you call “luck” is just volatility arriving ahead of schedule.

Besides, when probability keeps showing up on time, people start calling it skill. 😉

Good Luck All 🍀🙌☘🤞🚀👍😉

Athens81, you need to grow up. You come across as somewhat naive and very inexperienced.

I think you’re defining “real” by the method rather than the origin.

The ideas, views, and conclusions still originate from a human — the tool assists with expression. By your definition, using a calculator would make maths “fake,” or using spell-check would make writing inauthentic. Most people would agree that the thinking is what matters, not the instrument.

Communication has always evolved with technology. What hasn’t changed is that the value lies in whether the content is accurate, reasoned, and useful, not whether it was typed in one draft or refined with assistance.

If someone disagrees with the substance, that’s a real discussion. Debating the existence of tools is just debating the century we live in.

Matey, ye’re mistaking the ship for the wind. The compass doesn’t choose the destination > the Captain does.

AI is nothing more than a navigation tool, like charts, sextants, or a bit of rigging to keep the sails tight. The course, the judgment, and the decisions still come from the helm.

Every sailor speaks differently; some shout from the crow’s nest, some mutter on the deck, some draw maps. None is more “real” than the other. What matters is whether the voyage makes sense.

I’m not here to outshine anyone or win tavern arguments. I’m here because I enjoy discussing the winds, tides, and currents of this company with other travellers on the same sea.

If a new tool helps keep the logbook clearer, that’s not a weakness; that’s seamanship.

Shareflyer,

Bullet points and percentages are called analysis — they’re how adults discuss companies without resorting to emojis and memory tests.

As for AI, it’s a tool, like Excel, a calculator, or Bloomberg. It doesn’t replace understanding; it helps organise it. Dismissing information because of the format says more about the reader than the content.

And the £8? Markets don’t move on forum timelines. They move on to execution. Anyone who’s been investing longer than five minutes knows that.

Shareflyer,

Someone’s engineering CV doesn’t determine investing accuracy — it’s determined by whether they interpret financial data and business execution correctly. Markets reward analysis and judgment, not job titles.

If you disagree with the content, challenge the numbers or the assumptions. Dismissing it because you don’t like the source avoids the discussion.

The company’s results, cash flow and guidance will decide who’s right — not anyone’s background.

Retirment,

You’re still treating markets like a scoreboard with a whistle at the end of the day. They’re not. One date doesn’t validate or invalidate a thesis — it just provides another data point.

You’re also proving my earlier point: you’re long-term, comfortable, and holding for years. So whether £15 prints on one specific day or a few months later is largely irrelevant to your outcome. The destination matters far more than the timestamp.

As for “humble pie,” I have no issue adjusting views when evidence changes — that’s called discipline. What I don’t do is confuse probability with certainty or reduce investing to forum wagers.

Congratulations on hitting your targets early, genuinely. But retirement status doesn’t determine market accuracy any more than age does. Price will do what it does, on its own schedule, not ours.

Retirment,

Age is irrelevant — capital and decision quality are what matter in markets.

You’re aiming for £20 by 2028 while criticising a shorter-term projection in the same direction. That’s not disagreement — it’s just a difference in timing assumptions.

And markets don’t operate on “post if right, disappear if wrong.” Serious investors reassess continuously because price is a moving probability, not a pass-or-fail exam.

If tomorrow settles anything, it will be the data, not forum conditions or wagers.

NB > Why those 3 specifically? Because those are the three who make the errors — we’re just the quality control group.

🎯 The Route to £15 (Step-by-Step)

1️⃣ Hold the Uptrend Structure

The foundation: Price stays above ~£12 support

Weekly higher highs / higher lows remain intact

No distribution appears

As long as the trend holds, upside probability remains dominant.

2️⃣ Break the Key Resistance

The most important technical level:

£13.30 – £13.50

A sustained break above this: Removes overhead supply

Triggers momentum funds

Forces short covering

Opens price discovery

This is the gateway to £15.

3️⃣ Move Into the £14 Zone

After the breakout, the normal progression is: Consolidation around £13.50

Trend continuation toward ~£14.20

This stage confirms strength and attracts new buyers.

4️⃣ Final Extension Toward £15

Measured-move projection:

Prior impulse ≈ £1.8

£13.3 + £1.8 ≈ £15.1

This is a normal continuation move in a strong trend.

📈 What Fundamentally Drives It

Three forces:

Aerospace earnings growth

Market confidence / multiple expansion

Momentum participation

SMR is not required for £15.

⏱️ Timeline

Most realistic window:

1–3 months after a confirmed breakout

⚠️ What Could Stop It

Only meaningful risks:

Daily closes below £12

Weekly closes below £11.5

Major negative macro shock

Otherwise, the pathway remains intact.

✅ Bottom Line

Route to £15:

Hold support → Break £13.5 → Move to £14 → Extend to £15

Simple trend continuation.

AIMOO DYOR AND ENJOY THE VOYAGE🙌🚀😉

Mr Onions thanks you, Spot. On this is the real EL Gordo when tauro gets permitted, who knows where the SP goes apart from ballistic like a bull on steroids

1 day 18 hours 41 minutes

42 hours 41 minutes total

Bingo 🙌

I would say he is greatly unpredictable for sure.

Napalm1, Trump's chaotic tariffs are making waves from Canada to Iran, and sending a hospital ship to Greenland for no real purpose is somewhat clownish, with a turbulent week ahead.

After a quick morning dip down to touch the 10 mins 200 SMA, it's now bouncing and heading back up north through the clouds with 1335 visual skylight incomming then follows the barrier @1351. In conclusion, Rolls-Royce remains structurally bullish with technical conditions consistent with the early stage of a continuation move. A sustained break above £13.30–£13.50 provides a credible pathway toward the £14.50–£15.50 zone over the coming weeks to months.

ShareFlyer, the TACO amplifies the no reply, you walk the plank by sunset if no price reply is recorded, simple as that.

ShareFlyer, we await your answer.