Member Info for Super_Mouse

How long has it been since they were told their MiCA application failed? Have they mislead the market?

Odd they managed to sort the Polish deal out and have tried to bury the news on NYE

Anyone trust these guys still?

Yep

This BoD have delivered nothing but overpriced failure

Fair point Kat

Once the day traders sell out froth has been blown off today tomorrow the you’ll see the true impact of the RNS

Companies who build value typically release updates and RNSs a couple of times a month to build interest. These guys are clueless

Nope he doesn’t

Like some angry drunk tramp shouting at traffic from a roundabout

I see getting filtered by these muppets as a badge of honour

It’s 78% down. Who do you think could be right here?

What normally happens with micro-caps on news

Day traders ramp the SP and attract a few speculative investors along with LTHs topping up.

Day traders sell out next day creating a drop and the speculatives hang on for a week or two.

GST is so poor with news flow that they can’t seem to back news with news and build on it.

Thus far they’ve made Angra a bit more efficient and little else. They don’t have the management skill

They need better RNSs. It was still vague and ambiguous and open to interpretation either way.

Nice for a day trade but pointless for LTHs who are sat on a 77% loss for 2025 alone

Yeah sure. It’s doing what it always does . Tanking lower after a spike

Let’s wait another 6 months until the arrogant BoD spam out some over optimistic nonsense again

They are desperately flapping now. Like I said just after the RNS drop, Obvious BoL is a bust now it’s a race to the bottom.

Like after the FCA snub; run out by some small junk shell, do a ‘strategic’ raise then hope some license application works out

This is going to take years if ever

Yeah, in the same way Bonfire was going to help with their European strategy. Feels like the BoD are running out of ideas and other people’s money

Problem is the regulators can smell this application technique a mile off

Here comes the placing raid to pay for it all.

“Undisclosed sum’ FFS

Well I did say.

Worse still they probably used over inflated wafes to buy the stock in the RTO company

Shafting holders both ends.

When will people realise BoDs are in it for themselves and will.use you to fund their wealth dreams. Little like taking kids pocket money to buy lottery tickets

This "Quaker State" entity is a holding company for media and entertainment interests (such as limited partner interests in film and media) and is distinct from the well-known motor oil brand owned by Shell.

Seem some pretty crooked things pass by AIM/FCA in the past. It's a miracle that the BIDS directors are still free men

Not sure on the legality but the motivations seem a little suspects and the outcome will only benefit a couple of people.

Smelling a rat already

The board-level connections between Bay Square Pacific Ltd and Vast Resources PLC are characterized by significant overlapping directorships and shared equity interests, primarily involving Vast’s executive leadership.

Key Overlapping Personnel

Andrew Prelea: Currently the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Vast Resources PLC. He holds a 17.08% shareholding in Bay Square Pacific Ltd.

Paul Fletcher: Currently the Finance Director (CFO) and a Director of Vast Resources PLC. He holds a 5.00% shareholding in Bay Square Pacific Ltd.

Nature of the Connection

As of late 2025, these overlapping interests have led to a major Related Party Transaction under AIM Rule 13:

Reverse Takeover (RTO): In December 2025, Vast Resources announced a conditional deal to acquire Gulf International Minerals Ltd (a company 100% owned by Bay Square) from Bay Square Pacific Ltd.

Controlling Interest: Upon completion of this all-share deal, Bay Square and its shareholders are expected to hold approximately 80% of Vast's enlarged share capital, effectively making Bay Square the dominant parent entity.

Management History: Since January 2024, Vast has already been managing mining activities for Bay Square's assets in Tajikistan under a profit-sharing and management agreement.

These news articles explain the board-level connections, including overlapping directorships and equity interests, between Vast Resources PLC and Bay Square Pacific Ltd related to a proposed reverse takeover:

GFY BFD - The point I was making is that with a register stating who has been approved and who has applied (officially) and the state of compliance thus.

This would act as a guide to the public

Clearly you haven't a clue as to how regulation, especially banking regs work.

Lee - Those are fair points.

At the end of the day , the BoL are going to have to list compliant and none compliant companies on their website as they will become liable. How else are people to check if the company they are using is compliant or (as you state) in pre-compliance/license .

Failing that , it would be easy for companies to to keep going .

Ian - Fair points.

I'm sure they don't mind . If we are fighting each other then we are not fighting them.

It's a cautionary tale I've seen played out hundreds of time when you have a foreign BoD.

Merry Xmas all

Massive would be the one up to his neck in icy water on the Titanic dance floor shouting to everyone that "we could still make it to New York on time"