Member Info for SunDrum

@Dumbpunter - The truth is your narcissism does not allow you to accept that there are a lot of people who disagree with you. Your narcissism also makes you seriously overestimate your knowledge and capabilities. And just for the record, how long have you been investing in mining stocks?
As you never answer my questions I'll answer for you. 8 months.

@Dumbpunter - On 20th July I wrote, 'I'll do you a deal. I will contact LSE admin to confirm my identity with them (I'll provide them with my LinkedIn profile) and request for them in turn to confirm to you I have only one user ID on one proviso. You never post about PRE on LSE again (after all what is the point if you don't have any shares?) after having posted one final post apologising unreservedly to me and the other individual that you were wrong in your accusations. Deal or no deal?
I suspect 'no deal' but prove me wrong.'
You still haven't responded. Show a spine and respond.

@Theorist @Dumbpunter - Just as well neither of you own any shares in the company then.

@Dumbpunter - It is in every PRE investor's interest to understand why a non-investor clogs up the LSE PRE feed with their own personal brand of FUD.
Much the same as if a drunk, irrational gatecrasher appeared at a party and then loudly announced the party was a total $hitshow and then insisted on staying whilst continuing to irritate people with their boorish, self righteous, arrogant behaviour. Any rational sober person at the party would want to know why.

@Dumbpunter - I have asked you on numerous occasions why you comment on here and you have avoided the question every time. Perhaps it would help your cause to explain why you continue to talk down a share you are not invested in. Some transparency on your behalf would help us all to understand what drives your behaviour and in turn improve your credibility.
After all, on 25.1.2021 you stated, 'The planet where someone who has no shares in the company, who spends hours researching and maintaining a reddit sub forum boosting a company is consider (sic) a bit suspect.'
To paraphrase your own comment, a planet where someone who has no shares in the company, who spends hours talking down a company, is considered a bit suspect

@Dumbpunter - you have confirmed that you have no shares in PRE yet you continue to comment on here. Why?
I actually now think that you are embittered because you bought into RBW at 20p and have taken some heavy losses and are projecting your pain onto LTH's of an alternative play in REE.
You have been investing in mining stock for less than 8 months yet you put yourself forward as an expert. Why should anyone listen to a word you type? You aren't a mining engineer, you are not a process engineer, you are not an analyst and you are not a professional investor. Your predictions often don't come true and you are simply a small beer, private investor that has backed the wrong horse. You think you are way smarter than you actually are and frankly it is all pretty petty and embarrassing.

@Dumbpunter - 'Theo= teeth'. It is interesting your auto-correct on your phone typed 'Theo' rather than 'teeth'. Is it possible Theo is in fact Theorist and the two of you work together?

@Dumbpunter - Which bit is a lie? I assert you make wild accusations and never back them up.
Anyway, back to more interesting matters. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to your thought process on why you initially decided to comment on a stock you are not invested in. Did you, metaphorically speaking, pull a company name out of a hat and decide that was the one, or was your decision making process more strategic?

1. You have no stake in PRE and are like a caped crusading public servant to our rescue? You must think we were all born yesterday.
2. I did. You have more posts attributed to PRE than any other company.
I am interested in the facts and find false information offensive, e.g. accusing me of being another poster on here without any facts to back your claims up. On that subject, do you wish to take me up on my offer? Or are you still not willing to back up your claims?

@Dumbpunter - Please confirm which of my statements are lies;
1. You have no shareholding in PRE
2. The majority of your posts are about PRE
And, quid quo pro, please explain why you to spend so much time writing negative posts about a company you have zero investment in.

@Dumbpunter - Nope, you've made your position very clear. Thank you.

@Dumbpunter - Just to be clear, you are accusing a UK FTSE PLC of paying off an independent UK FCA regulated business? Is this correct?

@Dumbpunter - your message doesn't make sense. Who is Theo? You're a bit flustered perhaps?

If you are considering investing in PRE and have come on to this chat forum as part of your due diligence there is something you should be aware of. You will read negativity exclusively from only 3 contributors, namely @Dumbpunter, @Theorist and @Charles_H. What you need to be aware of is as follows;
@Theorist will not confirm he owns shares, he only comments on PRE (no other stock) and he only posts negative comments.
@Dumbpunter has confirmed he owns no shares and despite this the majority of his posts are regarding PRE.
@Charles_H claims to own shares, he only comments on PRE and he repeats the same question (with negative implications) ad infinitum when he has had the question answered ad infinitum.
The question is what motivates these three individuals to behave this way? It is widely agreed on a number of offline groups that their motives are at best for self interest, at worst they are proxies of darker forces.
If you are considering investing in PRE do your own research but ignore individuals who are deliberately trying to manipulate the market in their favour.

@(Conspiracy)Theorist - You have been asked 5 times whether you own PRE stock and refused to answer. PRE is the only stock you comment on. You only comment negatively. Hence you have no credibility and no-one is listening to you.

Tony. Thanks for the heads up. Scousers eh? Oh dear. Perhaps they should have spent their efforts concentrating on holding onto their Unesco World Heritage Site status rather than spilling bile on public chat forums.
If the second group are sponsored by our Chinese friends it means they are concerned about the West developing their own RE supply chain which encourages me further.
Either way, I will continue to challenge irrational postings by uninvested individuals who possess a clear agenda.

Electric vehicles? Sustainable supply chain? Non Chinese supply? Sound familiar?
https://www.ft.com/content/250d6dc7-d6e2-47d0-b76e-a9abaab5eeae

@(Conspiracy)Theorist - Been waiting for you to pop up again. For the 5th time of asking, do you or do you not own shares in Pensana?

Interesting response. No denial then?

@Dumb****er - As you have confirmed you are not invested in PRE, logically your behaviour (systemic negative posting about PRE) can only be explained by 2 eventualities.
1. You have a mental health issue. If this is the case I sympathise but you need to recognise your desire for attention will only achieve negative feedback which will only exacerbate your condition.
2. You are incentivised to post negative comments by a third party. The third party will fall into any number of categories, e.g. a hedge fund shorting the stock, a state actor whose interests compete with PRE, a fossil fuel based/climate denying organisation etc.
Rationally there is no other explanation for your behaviour. Please can you confirm which it is.