Member Info for strontium

Could be BB, I remember reading that Gencell started off at 5KW and then its output trailed off quite quickly.

Hi Rooky/pond, just click on the blue 'View all AFC Messages' just above the comment box. That will take you to the chat page proper and then you can fill in the 'Subject' box yourself.

My 590k this morning came through as a sell as well.

The order did come in the day after the trial at Kore should have passed 4000 hours, whether that was significant or not who knows. (Working on 1800 hours run-time as of the AGM)

Hi mucksy/Southerhay, what was reported back from the AGM just after they switched off the Kore for the first time, a few years back, sounded distinctly as though the way the stacks had been connected together was the problem, which if that was the case it could have contributed to quite a basic difficulty with alkaline fuel cells. I don't know much about alkaline fuel cells, but the one specific thing I did learn when I read up about them, is that they need optimum conditions around the electrodes, to keep them working properly.

The thing about the 10KW unit is that it can be manufactured as soley that. It doesn't have to be a 10KW unit suitable for fixing in a Kore's tier system, but which can't be used in a 10KW single unit system.
The fact that they were talking tier output, a few years ago rather than individual stack output and the problem that they had with Kore's decreasing output for each tier, to my mind means that they changed from dealing with the stacks as part of a group of units to dealing with each stack individually, which in the end means more economic manufacturing anyway.

The difference between the old Kore and a multiple 10KW unit 240KW system is that the old Kore consisted of 3 tiers of 8 stacks ostensibly producing 80KW per tier. Even if it had worked correctly the old Kore would not be nearly as flexible as a multiple 10KW system.

Hi beach, since the redesign of the BoP, the Kore as was, doesn't really exist. any longer. All systems installed now, will be based on the 10KW system whether they are single units, multiple units, 240KW systems or multi MW systems.

You obviously didn't see the article about Hydrogen from ammonia, which made the news today Newboy58.
"Hyundai spokesman Scott Nargar said the main advantage of hydrogen over electric cars was they could be filled up in three minutes like a normal car and had a range of up to 800 kilometres."

Queensland again
Hydrogen fuel from ammonia
Hydrogen fuel breakthrough in Queensland could fire up massive new export market
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-08-08/hydrogen-fuel-breakthrough-csiro-game-changer-export-potential/10082514

It's because the Share Price on this page 9.48p, is quoting the Ask: 9.48p
I wonder if that's by accident or design.
And now the Share Price: 8.64p is quoting the Bid:8.64p

Can somebody report this post and use the report form to ask the moderators if there is something wrong with the code and how the page was updated or if this is deliberate.

And now the Share Price: 8.64p is quoting the Bid:8.64p

It's because the Share Price on this page 9.48p, is quoting the Ask: 9.48p
I wonder if that's by accident or design.

What you have to remember beach is that although AFC is a 'tiddler' it has a whale shark in the form of RA on board.

Hi beach I'm getting to feel like that too!
However, I keep thinking that De Nora might buy a percentage of AFC with perhaps a few shares over to give AFC some extra working capital.
A possible guideline price; AlterNRG with dodgy tech was bought out for £4 a share at 10x the prevailing sp of 40p

Sorry to see you go.

PurpleBagel74, Go back and read banaman's post of last Thursday morning, he was talking staged payments, which would mean probably no necessity to fund raise.
Also, www.simplwall.st say that electrical analysts are talking break even for AFC this year.

ayoung555 I think desertwolf worked it out as end of this year, 2018, beginning of 2019.
Just check his posts,

Obviously, someone wanted to buy at 9p

I think that they had the deposit when the 12th July RNS came out, because it states in this RNS that they are 'confirming' the receipt of the non-refundable deposit. Therefore yesterday's RNS was just a clarification.
The trouble is it's the way they write their RNSs. The heading; 'HIGHLIGHTS ' doesn't really register when one reads the 12th July RNS, but if you read the points as if in chronological order as they happened, i.e. Highlights of this particular business deal, then they stated that they were already commencing the engineering study two weeks ago, which means they must have had the money then.