Member Info for strontium

Hydrogen Council are talking "investments of $20–25 billion annually for a total of $280 billion up to 2030 . . outlined within the reports. " Now AFC could be part of that.

From Wikipedia.
"Reports
Two reports have been released by the Council ('How hydrogen empowers the energy transition' January 2017,[7] and 'Hydrogen scaling up: A sustainable pathway for the global energy transition' November 2017[8]) outlining a path towards increased use of hydrogen as an energy carrier and feedstock within transport, industry applications, for residential and commercial building heat and for electricity generation. The reports were authored by the Study Task Force of the Hydrogen Council with analytical support from McKinsey & Company.

Scenarios outlined in the reports suggest that hydrogen technologies could contribute to meeting 18% of the world’s final energy demands, avoiding 6 Gt of CO2 emissions and creating a market with revenues of $2.5 trillion each year while providing 30 million jobs by mid-century.[9]

Investments of $20–25 billion annually for a total of $280 billion up to 2030 are outlined within the reports. "

I agree QuietlyCautious, if John Rennocks is only allowing commercially sensitive RNSs out, then this RNS has to be of commercial significance, even if we at the moment don't know exactly how this RNS fits in.

Interesting to see who's not on the list, no Gencell, Nedstack, Proton power or Fuelcell Energy

I think it's more an amuse-bouche than a starter, Tetrolite.

It looks as though AFC has a "$2.5 trillion market" to look forward to.

One of those rare occasions, when yesterday's AT 1 trade, actually produced an RNS!

https://www.investegate.co.uk/afc-energy-plc--afc-/rns/afc-energy-joins-hydrogen-council/201809050700157707Z/

1 million shares have been acquired today from the MMs and only 200k have been sold to them. Make of that what you will.

Hi desert I just thought I'd call it out into the open.It looks as though the last 300 trade was hidden in the 21,300 AT trade at 2.29 pm

Whatt did I say last Wednesday? A 300 AT 'sell' trade and they dropped the Bid (fractionally)
Isn't this Fraud?

You are right BB. On my reckoning, iIt would take around 2 GW of fuel cells to make several million gallons of water per day, so I think at the moment it references water purification. However, in ten years time . . .!

To make it totally clear, when an AT 300 ‘buy’ trade went through, both the Bid and Ask prices would be raised on the next trade that was made, similarly on an AT 300 'sell' trade, both Ask and Bid prices would be dropped on the next trade that was made.
With the AT 500 trades, if it was a 'buy' the Ask would be raised and the spread would be widened upwards on the next trade and if it was an AT 500 'sell' trade the Bid would be lowered, widening the spread downwards on the next trade.
And these were all blatantly obvious signs and thses signs only occurred with AT trades.

Tech-eng, you were obviously not frequenting these boards with any regularity 18 months ago.
I have evidence for MM codes with the AT trades on this particular share. It was so blatant that I pointed the trades out to people on this board, so everybody could see for themselves.
Every time an AT 300 ‘sell’ trade went through, the Bid price would be dropped on the next trade. When a 300 AT ‘buy’ trade went through, the Bid price would be raised on the next trade. When a 500 AT trade went through the very next trade would show that the spread had been widened. As those specific trades were so obvious one can surmise that the other AT trades in the codes are sometimes put to use.
Furthermore, manipulating share prices is fraud so telephoning others would be confirming the fraudsters. I seem to remember that LIBOR manipulation was confirmed on telephone conversations and people went to prison.

Hi Southern, I didn't hear it myself as I didn't attend the PHE meeting last Autumn, but according to a number of people who did attend, including posters on this board, one of AFC's BoD was there and this particular director made a point of telling everybody who was an AFC shareholder, to hold onto their AFC shares.

I do wonder if the Director who was telling everybody to hold onto their shares last Autumn, was doing so because they were aware that the sp was going to be hammered before it was allowed to take off.

Also, it might feel like Autumn, but it's August! We haven't even had the August Bank Holiday yet, so to expect major happenings this month, when Italy is on holiday is being naive at best.

For my part I'm sticking with the Director, who was not AB, and who was going around telling everybody at a meeting last Autumn, to 'hold onto your shares.'.

Hi sharesport fuel cells were mentioned in the Government Appeal decision, last year, as was a letter from Adam Bond which was itemised in the list of supporting evidence.

Appears to have gone the way of all flesh, taking one of my posts with him/her.