Uncertainty29 Mar 2019 08:25
That last RNS opened a can of it...
1) PEA delayed with no delivery timeframe offered.
2) The mine design and metallurgy are more "complex" than previously envisaged.
3) NM is continuing to pursue CGP, with still apparently little chance of success.
4) Long overdue updates on the regionals promised...
The argument of holders is that it's all part of NM's master plan - he is using the "complexity" of the metallurgy/mine design as an excuse to delay the PEA as long as he likes to facilitate the purchase of CGP. Now, if this is the case then:
1) he doesn't mind playing havoc with retail investors, as he would know the impact of said uncertainty.
2) retail investors can look forward to a protracted delay (months) of the PEA while CGP holders umm and arr, and the effect that will have on the share price will be detrimental, with the outcome is by no means certain.
Conversely, if the metallurgy and mine design are going to impact CAPEX and OPEX then that will have a materially detrimental effect on the NPV - again not great and until it is quantified, it remains a large uncertainty around the economics.
Still don't know why there has been a huge news blackout on the regionals for the last 6 months - news is promised soon though...how soon is anyone's guess. Is that the cherry he's thrown out to keep the price from tanking through the floor? Where are these drill permits? Q1 has been and gone. The drills have now been turning solely on Cascabel for 1/4 of the year and will have used up the allocated annual budget already. That means they are being forced to drill secondary targets to fill the time.
All this, of course, costs money and SOLG is burning about $10m a month. NM doesn't usually like to go below $50m in the bank (sensibly), and at the start of March they had $70m. Is NM really going to give a further chunk of the business away to Newcrest or BHP at this point, in order to raise money? I highly doubt it. That leaves institutions, and they almost always like a discount.