RE: Coal mining13 Dec 2022 17:19
At Keltic.
Think your last reply was on wrong chat.....
###I don't understand why you mentioned burning coal
Why not mention coal burning if the stacks can be used short term and the short term profits could be used to drive the business forward? Next few months I can guarantee people will be on here moaning about the financials of the company by April if not we'll before then. Never mind whether your environmental concerns out weigh the carbon producing side the business will not go forward and have the ability to drive the environmental side as much as it could of done, if at all. Were all PI's here with a vested interest in the business (I naturally assume). Surely anyone who wants the best for there investment and the green production of energy surely must see that sorry term negatives concerning carbon may have a huge effect on reduction of carbon long term via financials####
They have removed the heart of the processing plant etc as part of financing the BESS project and gaining money to basically strip areas to I would assume make more space for similar BESS areas.
Hence the burning coal, Sub-coal or anything else ain't gonna happen and would take far too long anyway if this were even possible , which it is not.
Sae are looking at alternative areas globally to use the Sub-coal technology so who knows?
Problem is it won't be going back into the grid for the UK?
Politics and all that.
Simple
Battery Energy Parks - more coming I would assume after watching Planning permission live feed.
Sub-coal somewhere else, I would like to think. Too good to waste.
Tidal slow burner to get 28mw and CFD5.
We shall see...
Stay safe