Member Info for SteJSteJ

No they weren't. Those saying get out were the ones saying the company had no value. Yet here it still is.
The levels we are at are due to the war. SP was pretty stable at 20p for months before.
RNS's before the war happened, to me at least, suggested things were close.

CTC - again, attacking me for calling out blatant false statements. No complaint about what buyontop stated being hugely speculative and without substance. Even been disproved by an RNS.

You and many others seem to think I'm a "ramper" yet all I do is call out the blatant lies. If being neutral is a ramper these days then what does that make you?

As for the company, I think it has a good chance of delivering its plan of selling substantially all of its assets. That's why I still hold my shares and haven't sold them.

As for when, no idea. War has made it a bit more complicated. As for how much, plenty more than what I bought for. I feel the opportunity is large, so I keep my shares. This isn't without risk, but it's a risk I happy to take.

What are your predictions then?

As Lovelyboy has laid out nicely here, a lot of this is out of the BoD control, yet you all blame the BoD?

So you've improved your view from "it'll never sell" to "it'll sell but for less than desired". What has brought about this change of heart to the more positive ScottyDogg?

Buyontop - what you have stated there is pure negative speculation. There is no evidence to support such a claim.

If I recall correctly, the AGM had a query if the party had completed DD was still at the table, with the answer being they were. Quite the opposite of what you state.

I don't think CALLS has ever said anything positive about this share. Very strange when they "claim" to be invested.
Easier if you just filter and ignore.

I appreciate its a lot of "feeling" over "facts", but saying investors have been duped is unproven either way.
When this resolves, one way or another, is when we will know if the communication "strategy" was justified or not.
Until then, or further news in the interim, it makes no sense to keep banging on about no news week on week.
It'll be time for the next AGM "shortly", if we've heard nothing that floats your boat by then, it'll be a good opportunity to register your displeasure.

Whilst I see what you're saying, I would argue any prolific asset seizing by Rus would result in no international investment in the country for the next 100 years.
Whilst mad Vlad could do anything, I'm not sure him or his other wealthy cronies would enter into such financial self flagelation.
Maybe China would pick up the slack, but who knows

Indeed bobby. It seems sensible to me that the BoD still look for the best deal for all involved.
I'd say only a fool would be wanting to sell for a any price due to the war.

For someone who is invested, you do seem to see the doom and gloom a most of the time. Quite a sad way to live your life imo, but you do you

Which fabled £5?

Yet again, attacking me but no comment on Calls 3p guarantee.
Anyone would think you want the share price to go down ...

So CALLS, you stated you expected to see 3p after the missile landed in Poland. How did that pan out? I think it opened up if memory serves. So another hugy incorrect prediction proved wrong in record time.

I have never predicted £5. You seem to have some serious reading comprehension issues if you think I have.

I appreciate reading isn't always easy for everyone, and maybe you didn't have access to decent education wherever you're from.
You can still change that though. Education sources aren't too expensive, so do take the time over the weekend to look into them. They could improve your life in many ways

"It's doomed, 3p tomorrow" vs "here's some excerpts from RNS's and some speculation based on them"

I know which I feel should make for a better discussion board.

Don't you have most of them in an ISA anyway?

But I'm not predicting £5 a share. It's an example value to make a point.
You seem to be struggling to comprehend that

Hmm, what a surprise. TreadingCarefully & CTC not getting the point of an example.
I notice again CTC that you attack me, but leave ScottyDogg alone despite his usual rubbish.

As I'm sure it was clear to all with a balanced view, the point being made was that if this asset sale results in people making a lot of money, I'm sure they'll change their tune regarding the opinions they have of the BoD.

Scottydogg - Really think that will depend on the outcome. If this sells for £5 a share, I think most would be happy to give the BoD another go at sorting out v2.
If it doesn't sell, or makes a small profit, then you may have a point.
But then again, you think it's a failure anyway so

Mr_Wolfe - At some point you'll have to read the RNS's and see what's going on here. Maybe the news too.
I find your view constantly negative to say the least

It's not a negative indicator either "Truth"factory
If anything, it suggests negotiations are ongoing.

RNS's prior to the war were quite positive on a conclusion being reached. I personally wouldn't consider the delay we are seeing, most likely due to the war, as dragging this out.

For me, I guess the proof or otherwise of this will be how swiftly this resolves post war (assuming it doesn't resolve before then).

Indeed. Number of followers isn't an indicator of right or wrongness