Member Info for Ssccss

Spod. The lack of transparency stinks. They are totally failing in their duties to shareholders.

Delta I think he would still have to disclose if his own wife and children had them, have seen similar issues on other shares.

Thank you ASI, that makes sense.

There is a conflict of interest, which he continually ignores/plays down. No doubt about that.

Hope so ASI.

For now, he is hiding behind how complicated the network of companies is... Therefore claiming uncertainty, so he doesn't have to disclose or acknowledge he may stand to inherit the shares.

Asimpleinvestor, maybe he doesn't want to openly admit the share will end up with him.

NU, you have such a bee in your bonnet about the TG group. Get some therapy and give it a rest. Honestly, it's done now. Quit whining. You don't see lots of us who voted no, gloating.

*without supporting information

Maybe SL should RNS why the company is on life support and actually share some facts with shareholders instead of saying it to just one shareholder at a meeting with supporting information.

There you go again NU, with your clear and effective communication haha

And yet you did. You crack me up.

NU, that's very funny coming from you. Total lack of self awareness.

What is wrong with you all?? Why are you constantly having a go at each other but you have absolutely zero to say about the outrageous behaviour of ppp over the last 12 months. Rose tinted comes to mind. Honestly, those who voted no just want their basic rights as shareholders respected. That's it. That should not be negotiable. Some of you seem to like being treated like crap.

M22C, you've offered no facts, just your opinion.

Yes but who owns a lot of those shares? Do we know?

Kong, please forgive me... But what's your point? The vote hasn't changed the prospects of ppp. It has simply stopped SL getting his hands on a significant amount of shares and therefore being able to override other shareholders in important decisions. Stop fretting. Let's see what happens next. I am totally relieved that the vote was so overwhelming in no's favour. Shows strong shareholder solidarity imo.

So 85% of us are wrong are we? I don't think so.

Nice to see an AGM is on the cards. That's one of the things wanted, along with the audited accounts. Finally. Let's hope he keeps his word.

It's common sense asimpleinvestor. Unfortunately, some seem to be lacking on the capacity to think rather than react.

But yes, directors should definitely reduce their wages. I don't understand what they can actually be doing to get paid for.