Member Info for Ssccss

*reinvent

Cambay has done nothing for syn. So hard to deal with the slow bureaucracy. This is for the best. Hopefully, syn can now reinvest itself and actually do something.

Yes, I agree wakey. A good outcome for us. Needed to be done.

I think I'm very happy with that. 6 times the current value.

actually to be fair, i don't agree tg are full of ****. they have passed on some robust information and like it or not, they are actually taking action, which i'm grateful for.

Maybe CW, who knows but we have to try to work together.

There has to be a bit of strategy involved here or there will be too much room for ppp to wriggle out of their obligations imo.

Well yes ASI, another thing ppp have failed to do. I don't think it's so much that the TG group only share when they want something but maybe they don't want all their cards out on the table all the time. This is a public forum which ppp can see.

OK so why don't the TG group let us know the questions and answers please? It don't think it matters in terms of the ppp situation but it might help build bridges between shareholders.

Apparently it was stated the audit is finalised... Surely that means accounts are done and ready to be published? Or am I missing something? Still no website.

If ppp wanted to communicate with shareholders, they would realise info via an RNS. So surely what was said is inconsequential?

ASI, I'm not particularly bothered about what was discussed because to me, it doesn't mean much unless it's in an RNS, and even then that's debatable. Discussion means nothing with ppp, only action matters imo.

Oh I see word spaghetti. That makes more sense. Thanks.

Ppp aren't going to share anything significant because it would have to be in an RNS? Or do the usual rules not apply because ppp are suspended?

ASI, I think it does matter very much that they obviously didn't cater for shareholders to attend the meeting. Another basic shareholder right flouted.

It must be obvious to all shareholders by now that SL just makes it up as he goes along.

Sorry daft question. I just reread the RNS. So they didn't actually do the vote in the end... He bailed as usual when it wasn't going his way. Couldn't make it up.

Can someone also explain the significance of "adjourning the resolutions until the AGM"?

Does that mean yesterdays vote doesn't count?

"Michael Carrick - Independent Asset manager for Petroquest"

What the bloody hell is he doing in a PPP general meeting.

That is bad.

Audited accounts finalised?

Also, I don't understand how SL can refuse to accept proxy votes? Please explain his logic?