Member Info for Ssccss

Maybe step away from the AI.

Please tell me... How can you AI know that we will lose everything? Have you thought that through?

How is it possible that your AI can predict the future?

Well that's the issue... The quality of AI output is very dependant on the input... You get out what you put in. So you kind of have to be quite aware to make sure it is looking at the correct information and reading it fully. Plus you need to interrogate it and look for it weaknesses. It's all about the programming and understanding how bias works. That's where the skill comes in.

Well it's interesting, because ppp bombard us with information and AI makes rather short work of it, if you know how to use it correctly.

Spod,

Resolution 12 asks shareholders to surrender pre-emption protection. Resolution 10 gives broad issuance authority. The company remains suspended, the FCA blockers are not itemised, the CLN structure is already in breach, and the RMD-related-party position is becoming stronger.

In this context, voting no is refusing to give away shareholder power without adequate information or protection.

I don't believe it's a good idea to put a plan on here for ppp to read...

Although, I would absolutely love to see their plan for getting back from suspension...

Sorry for which bit? The impaired assets or SL taking 51% of nobel US? Which part relates to TE? These are things that have happened post TE.

Honestly, it's like conversing with people suffering from dementia.

I feel the same WS. All I have right now is my voting power. My investment has been suspended for nearly 2 years. SL impaired the assets I invested in, seemingly without any due process and now he has half of them. So many things have happened that I have not had a say in, when as a shareholder (and quite a decent holding), I should have. It's not on. I will be voting to keep my existing powers until I see a viable way forward for existing shareholders.

Yes it's open tiger. Call them.

Interesting sharebel, because that's just your opinion and my opinion is that I can see JW voting no because he probably doesn't like what's happened and what continues to happen and he probably wants to retain some control via voting rights over his large investment, rather than signing that away. So I have to completely disagree with you.

Do you really believe that? What about JW? Does he want to lose his investments too? I think you have gone 2+2=5 rather than 2+2=4...

That link works.

Zag, many many months ago when some of us were pointing out the issues with the accountant we were told not to speak ill of the dead... And now you believe he's dodgy. It does take you rather a long time to catch up.

I was wondering this too -

"Shares Alloted at 23 December 2025 AGM (should we include these? has this now been cancelled or not - market not informed if so)"

That's the whole point which has gone over your head as usual.

The comments by the BOD are always positive. The details in the RNS are certainly less positive. The action in terms of returning to trading now the accounts are published is negligible. Ppp won't even grace us with the details of what are the remaining blockers.

Please tell me what happened to all the amazing new opportunities Mavriky has been exploring other than the ones we already own? I sure there was even a powerpoint? Merely PR as usual.

Only 12% interest out of the kindness of their hearts. Our saviours.

It's still 60% approx dilution outlined in the RNSs as a result of voting yes to these resolutions and that's before the RTO ( which will still happen) ... And that still doesn't guarantee ppp will return as the bod are so keen to tell us. So what are you going on about Zag...

No doubt some of you will keep dressing this turd up... Saying how pleased you are with the ppp board and how you look forward to your future riches. Not sure this is quite the rns you were expecting, at least I hope it's not. I thought we were waiting for operational news from texas and what were all the other opportunities discussed on the calls??? And yet, here we are focusing on as asset we already had, of which was written off and half given to SL. But you guys must still be thrilled.

Face it... Stringing us along for a long time... Want us to vote in favour to help them get what they want/need... No regard for the shareholders who have be done over in this whole saga. Why aren't we back trading.

Why no information on what is preventing this from returning to trading? What are the blockers?

-“in the majority, legacy issues” - so some new issues?

Not heard sparks be mentioned before... This is not going to be a quick process at all imo.