Member Info for Spikeyj

BBC is one info source amongst many. & of

course like any other should be considered thoughtfully alongside other knowledge / analysis etc …. but overall the bbc is pretty good for news in my view compared with many other sources cited on this board … eg think someone was linking to Pravda earlier on, LOL!

And meanwhile

Why Trump-Putin talks unlikely to bring rapid end to Ukraine war https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c14gkkzvpx8o

14:25 B_positive “…only for it to go to 9p in anticipation of the war ending.”

B_positive is lying again i see. he’s tried that one before.

… and chucking around lots of utterly random and rampy price targets today. ? are there really any pis left on AIM who fall for that kind of dishonest b**ls**t?!

meanwhile. EUA is of course still the same company that already tried and failed to sell any assets at all even long *before* putin’s invasion, including the lengthy and failed FSP.

it’d be good to see putin stop murdering ukrainians one day, but it won’t make any difference to the underlying value of this licence squatting company that can’t mine profitably, doesn’t explore, can’t sell any of its assets, and daren’t publish DFS data.

11:35 and winona will accept my proposal of marriage soon, is what some are saying.

If trump had continued biden’s policy, putin would not have been emboldened. trump presidency has been a disaster for ukraine, and deeply, utterly shameful for the USA.

… still baffled why peeps think any developments in ukraine make the slightest difference to the underlying very poor quality assets that EUA has unsuccessfully been trying to flog for ages…

…but hey, if trustworthy folks like b-positive, chessgambiteer and gecko think so, then it must be true eh?

Bizarre … particularly as amit’s own craven retraction explicitly states that cloudtag has no deal at all with Johnson and Johnson, and never has had either.

she must have lost an awful lot of money to be that desperate in her ‘thinking’ now.

Gecko WSBN 18/7 s/p 0.64: “7’s will go today IMO”

… that’s the same share where you claimed you then bought more at 0.465 four days later … and then eight days later when the s/p had fallen still further to 0.355 you claimed that you’d sold out a week before. lol!

… carry on trading, guru-g…

You’re much funnier when you actually talk about shares.

(? do you think EUA might have been his first go?)

Might be worth watching EME for a giggle. … not a stock i know much about, tbh, but i see that gecko was posting up lots of rockets about his 0.105 buy-in back on 18/7 (around the same time he was predicting 0.7/0.8 ln wsbn) …he’s only down about 10% on the bid side so far, so it seems to be one of his better calls so far.

He’s got a strange approach to investing - eg

Gecko on WSBN, 22nd July, s/p 0.455, “Share price is a joke, whats [sic] changed for the worse since yesterday’s RNS and last week…. absolutely nothing. Bought more at 0.465.”

… but then …

Gecko’s next post on WSBN, 30th july, s/p 0.355 “I sold out about a week ago, I have been in shares in the past where companies are a bit too much on social media and tweeting on drill sites, with trucks etc only to drop a bombshell. Due to past experience of these situations I got out”

Never too late to diversify, gecko, important especially as you get older.

Oops, I take that back, see he’s posted a smattering on a few others very recently … maybe finally losing his faith in CS, putin and donald.

Sb, why do you think gecko only ever posts on this share? … would have thought a big hitter like him would have a diversified portfolio, but his financial interests appear very restricted.

… in my view also, there’s a big difference between being on a share discussion chatboard, *in order to discuss a share* ( - whether positively or critically - ) from someone using a share chatboard mainly as a place to abuse and insult other people.

Carp, i am primarily here just for the laughs and occasional learning, not to buy or sell EUA shares.

And very late to this party, i finally own some palantir directly (rather than just as a fund component) - so my apologies folks if i have now completely jinxed it.

Repetitive and immature foul mouthed belligerence has got nothing to do with making money.

I would have thought the specific claim followed by craven total retraction should be enough to get a financial journo / diarist to put out a couple of paras.

That may be how he would like you to think b3ast - ie that this update is yet more of the same.

he’s trying very hard to make people forget/ discount that something very distinct and different *has* very recently happened - i.e. amit very specifically claimed that Johnson and Johnson were buying; j&j lawyers warned him to stop, and amit then was forced to completely and publicly retract his false claim that j&j were buying.

amit would love people to read his updates now as, yet more of the same, to while away another year or two.