RE: PEEL 20%+10 Oct 2019 20:55
InvestingGenius: "As for cash burn their costs have reduced massively down to just £849k and they will be profitable in 2020, which means every month that figure is getting less and less."
that makes no sense. adme do not have positive cash flow
at present, because the revenue they get from the oil lifts
just goes towards paying off debt at the project level. the
company has said that it hopes to become cash flow +ve
in H1 2020, i.e. once they've paid off their share of that debt.
(note, the company has **not** claimed it will be 'profitable'
then, just that they hope to be 'cash flow positive', different!)
but none of the above means that their 'admin costs' are
getting smaller, month by month - i.e. just because they are
paying off project level debt does *not* mean that they are
paying any less each month on stuff like the huge BoD wages,
keeping the lights on, getting paperclips replaced,etc etc.
secondly, the half-year report stated that admin
expenses were reduced to £511,000 over the
six month period reported on. that is about
£85K per month cash burn, month on month.
(curiously, IG mentions a figure instead of £849K ...)
third issue in IG's post re cash position,
IG figures don't take into account that the
cash raised from placings etc was reported
as gross figures, not *net* proceeds. so in
working out what cash ADME actually got,
it is necessary to deduct from the gross sum
the likely costs of organising the placements.
(it looks like dan and i have some similar-ish
views regarding the cash position, but we differ in
that dan thinks placing costs are lower than i do.
dan's figures also look slightly different as he
is forecasting that they will bring in the rest of
the conditional placing money. i do accept that
is possible, but my figures were simply about the
money already collected and cash position now,
rather than forecasting out to end of december.)
it is odd that some optimistic posters seem to think
that ADME's cash position *is* relevant when they post
their own views that the company has more than £1mill,
but then think cash position isn't that relevant when
the reality of a lower cash position is pointed out.
to be sure, if the CEO manages to pay a small sum to
buy a magic money tree asset that immediately brings
in lots of positive cash flow, for only a small outlay, then
the company's cash position will indeed look lots better.
... i'm not that convinced that is what is going to happen.