Member Info for Spikeyj

Well, i would very much like you to be right, bubbles, fingers crossed!

but do bear in mind that the current share price is already pricing in some degree of expected downward interest rate movement, s/prices are forward looking.

and also bear in mind that holders will be picking up pretty generous dividends anyway along the way? — so if s/price makes it to 550p by xmas 2025, that would be 24% gain over 22 months *plus* the dividend payouts. i’d be pretty happy with that myself.

(Or, putting it another way, are you arguing that those EUA LTHs who have consistently posted expressing a long-standing positive personal opinion about EUA shares are also ‘agenda’ posters?? - or is it only folks who post sceptically about EUA that have ‘agendas’, in your view?)

(Or putting it another way, what do you believe that my “agenda” is??)

Leno, but what do you *mean* by the use of that word, ‘agenda’? — i am simply expressing my consistent, long-held, truthful personal opinion.

Leno, not sure what you mean by “agenda”, tbh.

i’m simply expressing my own personal opinion about EUA’s value, as i have transparently, honestly and consistently over the years with EUA.

you are of course also fully entitled to your own different opinion, and we’ll both see how EUA gets on as the weeks & months tick on in 2024.

… are all opinions ‘agendas’, from your perspective?

Bubbles, shooting for 550p by xmas 2025, organically, or 650-725p if attempted takeover by then (? dunno, maybe 10-15% chance on that timescale?). jmv.

(obviously, depends on putin not nuking us all into a pile of glowing nutty slack before then.)

(I’m not sure EUA is entirely “valueless” - i’d guess that the shell might still be worth about £1.5 million after the final pile-up?)

Yes, i’ve been pretty consistent in my view of EUA’s underlying *value* over the last few years, which is of course rather different from the share price … price is what you pay, value is what you get.

the share price was heavily ramped up by the ACF / ‘massive dividend’ p&d, followed by umpteen smaller attempted replays exploiting the same pipe-dream …. but nothing they’ve done over the last few years has actually made any significant change to the underlying value of this company, imv, other than dunning some chunky placing money which was promptly siphoned off well away from the london listed company, never to be seen again imv.

“…when the truth comes out.”

still a little way to go on that, mcap needs to fall another £40million or so to reflect true underlying value imo.

Bit weird that the list at 15:03 doesn’t include the possibility that amit’s been using this series of updates to flog yet more shares to gullible pis.

“… he still has some kind of reputation to consider …”

? you gotta be kidding, right!?

Antha, those guys are still around, and still up to the same old tricks ramping (‘promoting’) crappy AIM shares for money, although mainly using other IDs these days. aberdeenman was very active posting as mac4671 while the EUA p&d was under stay, although that’s fizzled out of course.

Mine not working, seems they can’t sell the product previously dug up, and if they try restarting the mine it will simply make them run out of cash sooner, since it costs them more to dig anything out than they could get from sales —- they have a small, mothballed loss-making mine & a dwindling cash position.

… worth noting re cash flow and roubles/retaining money in russia, the AIM listing costs and nomad fees can’t be paid in roubles, they need £££ to remain listed and trading.

B1ll, re 13:56, not possible to borrow any non-negligible amount, hence no new shorting (and I think very few outstanding old shorts these days):

IG: “This market may not be sold to open due to to stock borrowing restrictions in the underlying market.”

I thought the ramper tale was that the concentrate sale was deliberately being held back by EUA until the tax case was sorted? … that particular story begins to look rather thinner the more time ticks on since resolution of that case.

… just need a couple of those takeover rumours back again, lol…

(putting it another way, i did try to warn you, back when you had a chance to act on that to save your money. de nada!)

Think also on this, trombone:

i was here, posting on the ctag board way back when it was still trading and listed on AIM … back when davidgreece & liam & mrselfridge & aberdeenman were pumping like crazy and trying as hard as they could to silence any dissenting voices … back in the days of that laughable ‘order’ with second chance [operating from that lock-up garage], back in the days of the promised runway in the jungle, before the “miscommunication” (- cough, LOL - ) happened regarding the novum placement, which cost CTG its nomad and its listing…

thing is, trombone, if you had managed to be less blinkered back then, and paid some attention to the sceptical voices, such as mine, you wouldn’t now be trapped in this utterly worthless share with a “considerable amount” (for you) of cloudtag shares.

it’s not smart, in investment terms, to read only what you want to be told.

Trombone, not up to you where or when i post. stay frosty.

I’ve heard that the next company registration will be in narnia.

… interesting how quiet he’s gone since the report to SFO. presumably calculating what his remaining room for manouvre is … ? stop digging / stay low & hope everyone just gives up and goes away, fade to grey, versus spin more tales to maintain chances of a few more share sales from the few gullible idiots still on board.