RE: Hmmm16 Nov 2018 07:19
EyeGuy, I get that but there is no reason proof of money being sent could not be given, this is basic banking, even in the U.K., it doesn’t have to “clear” but they would know if it’s been sent, and could quite easily have confirmation from the bank that a bond has been agreed for the other $3mil. I feel some are being very niave here on this subject. This is 21st century banking, legal teams, government. We aren’t dealing with joey and he sweet shop or the local paperboy!