Firering Strategic Minerals: From explorer to producer. Watch the video here.
Helpful If RRR could sell RRAL for 6 million it should be done NOW. That a quick profit
No ever went broke taking a profit.
Maidit-- Happy? No I am not happy with this investment. Yes I am a shareholder average cost around .35
Are you shareholder ? Are you happy?
Why did i respond to your post? Because you posted that AB stated --2 days to get cash and AB did not say that. Even you admit that it was your interpretation. there is nothing wrong if that's what you believe. But I believe the process is more involved a-finalize arbitration b-get approved by judge c-take it Gencamines who will then process it for payment (probably 5 just for that d- get funds in DRC bank account controled by RRR e-RRR arrange to send fund out of country
Personally I guess this process is 2-4 weeks. Why am I being picky with details. Because if people expect 2 days they will be disappointed when it does not happened in 2 days , then this board will be filled with posts that AB is a liar, look at his history, remember Greenland etc etc etc
Zumore The implication of Gecamines not paying means they sold a property that they did not own. Even if the DRC courts ignore that issue I am sure the international court system would jump all over them
Maidit 308 DRC cash -Everyone go back and listen again. AB said 'couple of days to sort out'
that is far different than '2 days to DRC cash'
There remains a large unknown at to cash as well as timing
Helpful Your post is an acknowledgement that his mojo was missing. I agree
Banbury agree with your point of 'why take risk now' Why not wait and do deals AFTER DRC cash?
JFK8 having spent some time on a farm I can tell that is easy to do. Nice to see someone is so positive about RRR
From RRR's presentation
"Faso aims to become cash flow positive in H1 2024."
RRR seems to be making good strides towards this objective
Talkinto - RRR insiders buying--certainly it would be positive for existing shareholders and other potential shareholders.
I am not sure about insider trading laws in the UK or how strictly they are enforced. In North America, particularly the USA they tend to look at such events with 20/20 hindsight. Meaning if the insider buys and the share price goes up then that shows they had insider knowledge. The insider who purchases those shares then has to hire an attorney ($$$$) to defend themselves
In addition I am not sure if any of the RRR insiders has any investable cash to actually buy shares. I would guess AB needs to get his salary to pay his bills.
Talkinto two chances at share buyback Slim or none RRR has too many projects, all of whom need money spent on them RRR has obviously borrowed money which has to be paid back. RRR will owe taxes in the DRC which will also take a significant part of these funds as well
Gold will continue to go up until it stops going up and then it go down.
Gold will go down until it stops going down and then it go down.
Gold may continue to trade sideways until it goes up or goes down
** Everyone is free to use my price predictions to make lots of money trading the gold market
Your welcome
Helpful Please work out the numbers.
I am very busy watch the lithium exports (as stated last year) and counting how money ALR is worth (also from last year), waiting for the April cash flow (also from 2023) and lastly still waiting for the translation for the NOMAD on the arbitrators decision (ancient history).
Thankfully despite the drop of lithium prices ALR is still worth lots of money
DRC I am sure AB would have happily sold it for the same $500+ million that it was actually sold for
Zumore thank you for the explanation and comments
I. too, have now placed "news' on filtered. I dont mind negative, positive or even posts that are obviously pumping posts but outright lies are just really annoying to me which is my personal issue and perhaps something I need to work on.
I hope AB's next trip to DRC achieves the result needed= signed agreement and begin the process to send cash back to the UK
Offtopic so I apologize but I am curious about the UK
news wrote " NO ONE WILL COMMENT. Per the Queenberry rules, DO NOT comment on matters relating to the Premier Family. Everyone knows that in Blighty. Sorry, will NOT respond and sorry , not guilty"
1) "Premier Family" is this another term for the/The Royal Family? or is it some other family group?
2) Queenbury rules I am aware that these are boxing rules but do they apply to written posts or making comments about the "Premier Family"
3) "Blighty" as in "Everyone knows that in Blighty" So does everyone know this?
I must confess that I do not know either of these two things but then I am not in "Blighty"
Interest fact-Almost everyone in prison believes that they not guilty despite being proven guilty in a Court of Law.
De -Nile is not just a river in Egypt
News - you wrote "I post in Investor Chronicle style ie Bull and Bear points and therefore, maintain an IMPARTIAL VIEW. I stand on this.
Please elaborate.
1--This type of writing style is not taught in Canada and I find no reference on the internet
2- Bull and Bear points I see your Bull points but dont see any Bear points
3) points I see long narrative but no points, perhaps this is the style but please highlight the points you are actually making
I must admit to being distracted by the obvious lies so it useful to at least me if those were eliminated
News observations
1) you deflect once again your post was ""I was NOT aware that the British Royal family makes criticism of each other." ----YES, I CONFIRM THAT I DID STATE THAT VERBATIM."
Note the word 'the' is lower case note upper case which you now cite as a material difference
2) HRM- now you cite someone must have this title to be part of The Royal Family. Since I cited with references Prince Harry who I recognize is not currently a member of the 'working family' however at the time of his criticism's he was in fact had the title HRM
Please stop embarrassing yourself with such lies.
News observations
1) you deflect once again your post was ""I was NOT aware that the British Royal family makes criticism of each other." ----YES, I CONFIRM THAT I DID STATE THAT VERBATIM."
Note the word 'the' is lower case note upper case which you now cite as a material difference
2) HRM- now you cite someone must have this title to be part of The Royal Family. Since I cited with references Prince Harry who I recognize is not currently a member of the 'working family' however at the time of his criticism's he was in fact had the title HRM
Please stop embarrassing yourself with such lies.
News as you stated -'Naysayers use diversions' this is what you are doing by adding in so many qualifications about what you wrote "no longer a working royal' yet the original "British Royal Family'
etc etc
News How about this article see https://cafemom.com/entertainment/prince-harry-spare-criticized-royal-family
"20 Times Prince Harry Publicly Criticized His Own Family "
Yikes How embarrassing that a non resident knows more about than the UK resident