Member Info for southcoastbather

Who said every business can get finance? I certainly didn't.

Little mr word twister squirming again.

"Bfdinvestor

Posts: 7,797

Price: 12.66

No Opinion

RE: EVERY SINGLE DAYToday 12:47

Every business that ever went into administration was able to get a loan...

Lol. How about Ted Baker pmsl"

---------

Why did you go quiet bf???

Because you opened your mouth and the then did the research??

"Ted Baker had significant debt which was a primary factor in its financial struggles and subsequent entry into administration in March 2024. The company's debt had been rapidly increasing for years, making it difficult to manage amid declining sales and increasing costs, particularly after its acquisition by Authentic Brands Group in 2022. This mounting debt, combined with other financial pressures, ultimately led to the company's collapse and administration"

Don't mention the new low.... Shhh

What about ted baker? "lol and pmsl"

That's a ridiculous argument to say a business is able to get a loan... Every business that ever went into administration was able to get a loan.....

Mt has it occurred to you that they cannot counter the "narrative" as it is in fact the truth?

Seeing the anger coming through there mt..... Don't take it out on me lad.

Yea you are right....

430p mcap 5 billion - 12p mcap 170 million doesn't mean the company is in financial distress.

Lets have this conversation when h1 results are out...

Every single bit of information points to financial distress.... And h1 will further compound this.

Would you care to predict h1 figures?

The share price gives the reality check.

Despite all the waffling clowns.

I'd guess the sp is in agreement that the company is in financial distress.

"Anything that is fact based rather than the usual made up BS, such as a CVA that could never happen, or an intricate plot that involves directors buyimg shares so they look less guilty when the company is taken private against the best interests of the lender who holds a first charge over all the assets"

Who has said the company would be taken private against the lenders best interests??

Its the opposite in fact - the company would be duty bound to call in an administrator to PROTECT the lenders..... Thats when all the recent box ticking will come into play.

If a company is desperately seeking to borrow more money at a higher rate (ridiculously high rate in fact) then surely that company is facing a cash crises?

You only need look at the 3 year history to know the company is having major cash problems.

Listen to what Dan said or what Phil dribbled?

"Just go and listen to Finley's comments when he references Debenhams.com's actual profit for last year southcoast."

Wrong, they have completely removed the word pre tax profit from the full year results for the last year. They did however make a 349 million loss group wide.

They were singing about the measly 5 million" pre tax profit" the year before, even though the group made a whacking great loss of 160 million.

Literally so obvious debenhams market place will be posting a loss on companies house.

Then when they post h1 results for this year group wide revenues will still be declining at over 10 percent... With a loss coming in over 80 million.

5p - 7p after h1 results.

All the while the fools are falling for the box ticking....

Bruce Ismay and Edward smith at the helm....

No that's not my bear case.

The bear case is -

Revenue is still falling....

Losses are increasing...

Staff numbers are far to high....

The business cant be right sized fast enough...

Debenahams market place is about to post a loss for last year when accounts lad on companies house...

How does a director buy contradict the bear case here?

Every single director buy here in the last 5 and a half years has resulted in a loss for them.

Every single seller here in the 5 and a half years has saved themselves a further loss.

As for the shorters - they have creamed it.

Im not seeing the contradiction.

Why would he bother to put a bid in here?

Kamani has already proven he has no care for anyone but his families interests

Frasers could bid 80p and the board would tell shareholders it undervalues the company and they should vote against it - do you know exactly what the large portion of shareholders would do? They are so dumb they would vote against it.

Kamani isn't interested in exiting this company any time soon.... He won't go until forced to by an administrator. And then he will have no choice.

In order to make a bid he was also told the deal would include him not being able to pursue the directors that drove the company into administration losing him his initial stake...

If they had nothing to hide then why request that.

He has been taking action against the administrator Jeff rowley, have look and you will see.

He never got outbid.... He got locked out....

Director box ticking is more appropriate....

Running off with wheel barrows full while chucking a handful back in....

Doesn't one of them sit on the remuneration committee?? He surely has the biggest box to tick....

"we really believed it would all work, look I even bought a few shares"...

Nothing more nothing less.