Member Info for southcoastbather

Total cash over 2 million then.... I knew it was around 1.9 odd million....

Compare dans total remuneration for that year vs John Lyttles total remuneration... It's ridiculous...

Yes its in the remuneration section

Anyone notice this property being sold???

Sale of Britannia Row

On 30 April 2025, the Group completed the sale of a property located at Brittania Row, London, for a total cash consideration of £9.0 million. The property had a carrying amount of £9.5 million as at 28 February 2025 and was classified under property, plant and equipment in the statement of financial position.

The sale will result in a loss on disposal of approximately £0.5 million, which will be recognised in the consolidated financial statements for the year ending 28 February 2026.

He didn't get 1.9 million in cash then mt??

"As for your previous post, I don't post defamatory and libellous comments unlike southcoast."

Spends 2 years accusing the market makers of dropping the price for fraser then comes out with the above beauty....

Dont panic guys, plt will soon be sold for 300 million....

Anyone believe there is actually a sales process going on??

"I don't believe the ownership of this company is truly reflected by the rns histor"

Again, this is my belief and I don't tey to force it down anyone else's throat...Its my opinion you could say also.

Quite rich coming from someone trying to blame mm'for 4 years straight for the sp decline.

Sweet dream....

I believe we will see 10p by Friday....just my opinion😊

I stated how ridiculous the pay was to even be considered

You mentioned the bonus being is stocks amd it being a bit "meh""

I asked what the split was

You repeated asking what the split waa

I then highlighted the fact it was 3.5 times the annual remuneration of the previous ceo to highlight how ridiculous the remuneration is.

You think its a bit "meh" where as I think its absolutely ridiculous.

You seem to post is a similar manner to bf - the delusion must be spreading eh.

There - so now you're "aware".

"The current directors also believe that a relevant factor for the independent shareholders of the Company in considering the current situation is whether any of boohoo's board members, their associates, or any other persons connected with boohoo, owns shares in the Company and whether, in fact, the total shareholding of boohoo and its associated or otherwise connected persons is truly limited to 26.6%.

The directors would consider it to be surprising if boohoo, with a shareholding of just 26.6% (assuming that is correct), would launch such an aggressive public campaign without the support of, or having first consulted with, other major shareholders of the Company. The board would therefore question whether, if other shareholders were in fact in discussions with boohoo to take control of the Company's board (as boohoo is attempting to do), the potential legal and regulatory consequences of any such possible alliances or discussions have been properly considered."

Probably easier to look at it as the total remuneration was 3.5 that of the previous ceo and on a year when the company his record losses of 349 million....

Why would the moderators ban me!?

Im stating exactly the same as what bob holt stated in an rns that is still love on the lse website? Surely if there was anything wrong with that statement they wouldn't have published the rns on the lse platform?

You seem very touchy - as though you have to reply to every single post I make, almost like a bully... You realise bullying is not allowed and can result in a permanent ban.... Many other user names have dissappeared in the last couple of years that acted this way.

You seem to think you have some sort of job title on this forum...

I bet you are on here bullying everyone all day and at the same time emailing admin crying wolf.

Its not my fault this is sinking.

Reardon - name one boohoo director who hasn't lost money buying shares in since ipo...

What was the split cash vs shares?

I don't believe the ownership of this company is truly reflected by the rns history - I just do not believe enough shareholders outside of the family were stupid enough to vote in favour of the ridiculous remuneration.

Bob holt of revolution beauty stated similar over at revb.

I still can't quite comprehend the idea that management believe they deserve bonuses - ceo of a failing company with an mcap of 170 million paying a remuneration of 4.5 million pounds.

Https://www.marketbeat.com/instant-alerts/debenhams-capital-londebs-insider-purchases-199854987-in-stock-2025-09-30/

😂😂😂😂

Every share that is sold has a buyer, now who the buyer is can vary.... So every selling share get bought by someone or thee would be nobody to pay for a sold share without a buyer....

So bf waa wrong....

He has blamed mm's from 400 down to 11p

Never known a fool like it, blaming everything and everything except himself and management...

Yes, a buyer and a seller are essential for every share trade; the stock market facilitates this by bringing together investors who want to purchase shares (buyers) and investors who want to sell their shares (sellers). Each completed trade requires one party to buy and the other to sell at a specific price, with the forces of supply and demand determining the fluctuating share price.

"Market cap now less than just the valuation of the Top Shop brand

The market makers could stop this continual drift anytime they want to.

It's weird that they choose not to"

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Sure they could.