Member Info for Soupdragon78

Does make you think about combination therapy.

Magpie, wouldn't read much into that PureTech is London listed and has more of a presence in the UK than most are aware of.

One to note, that the PureTechs ODD was on the FDA database before the company announced it via RNS.

Interesting development LT.

Is it a rival or something else?

FX, the fact is you can verify it very easily, you can contact the same person Tonto contacted.

Instead you decide to question the legitimacy of Tonto’s post, you literally said you didn’t trust it, which means you thought he was lying.

You said you didn’t believe Tinto and his email from Tim Metcalfe, but you don’t want to speak to Tim Metclafe yourself to find out if it’s true or not.

I think you probably need to apologise to Tinto for accusing him of lying.

FX, maybe contact Tim Metcalfe, thats what any long suffering shareholder would do.

Are you saying the company lied about the request for information just to cover up lack of an outlicensing deal?

Mills, day 90 was back in November. Requests for information have no deadline.

That was Drago who said 1 month from receipt of additional info.

It can be commercialised without FDA ODD.

Hi OSD, for me, like everyone else, its a guessing game.

As we know there was the RNS on the 12 Nov telling us about the request for additional info / clarification. At that date the company said they would respond to the FDA 'as soon as possible'.

Around the 18th December, both yourself and another posted feedback from Tim at IR saying the response had been submitted. So we know they submitted at some point in that month inbetween the RNS and the investor relations email.

It could have been a few days after the RNS or it could have been early to mid-December, we don't know.

With the 90 days chat, my understanding is that this relates only to the initial submission. The FDA gave their response after 90 days, which was a request for info.

As far as I'm aware, there is no timeline for the FDA to deal with responses to clarification requests. Whereas if the request was made within the initial 90 day period then the clock would stop and restart after receipt of response.

As the last RNS for annual results states, the company has had no feedback on timelines from the FDA. So it could land anytime now, or take a few months more. We simply do not know.

What date did they submit the response?

It was oversubscribed because the share price was above 0.3 at that time, so an instant profit.

Buying on the opening market is a different matter.

The FDA reduced the ODD process down from 120 days to 90 days back in 2017. We've done the 90 day process and got a request for clarification, there is no timeline for the FDA to respond to clarification request submittals.

Lol! Like the FDA orphan drug committee sit and watch clips of a £4m Mcap company interview on a British share discussion platform and then decide to punish them for it.

Magpie, they issued that RNS last week.

What’s going to make people buy to get it up to 0.5p before any news?

Ok, just strange that you would want put it out there that they would look to do that when they haven't said they would.

Did they say they wanted to raise funds before the FDA ODD release?