Member Info for Soupdragon78

Again Trombone you are entitled to your views, but I still don't understand how people can say they don't trust the board or believe in the company and yet still remain invested.

Isn't the whole point of investing about believing that something is going to be more valuable in the future than it is now?

Personally don't care what you do, I just really dont understand your rationale, it defies all human logic.

You've got money in a share you have no belief in, you don't believe in the management, you don't believe any potential outlicense partners exist, you don't believe in the the product and you don't believe it will get back to the price you bought in at, yet for some weird reason you never want to sell and move on.

If this is how you get your kicks then you're into some weird sh*t.

Does that mean you'll sell FX?

Prof. Athol Wells of Royal Brompton is key background to the move to combination therapy in IPF.

NXP003 was ditched years ago

Ok thanks LT, the data on the page source picks up any change of any kind on a webpage, whether its graphic or not, so tells us there has been no change.

Also if you look at the bottom right there is the symbol of the web design company....have a look at their website. ;-)

Trying again.

meta property="article:modified_time" content="2021-09-03T14:15:57+00:00" /

LT the pipeline page of the website has not been updated.

The page source data tells you when it was last updated.

""

"you're simply making excuses for more failure"

No, there is no failure until they shut up shop and walk away.

All I care about is them closing a deal at a value higher than where we currently sit, whether its tomorrow, two days, two weeks, two months or two years.

FX, the clock stops on the 90 days when they issue a query and restarts when they receive a respond.

The bit without a deadline is how long a company has to respond.

There is no deadline for the submittal of response. NFX can take as long as they want.

You are saying why can’t NfX deliver to a deadline. I’m simply saying that there is no deadline on their side.

‘Why are you always so quick with an excuse as to why the board can't deliver to deadline?’

This is the problem with your post… there isn’t a deadline.

Fx, read the rns. They have said that the fda query was similar to a request from the EMA, similar does not mean the same.

As I said before, I drive a car…. Lewis Hamilton drives a car… they both have four wheels which makes them similar… but the cars are not the same.

How many times does it neeed saying. Both the FDA and EMA give guidelines for what they want submitted, they then review and as questions as necessary.

The company cannot guess what they may ask for, nor can they submit every single scrap of information they have to hand on the off chance they get asked for that.

If you believe that, then yes.

Don't go by whether it shows blue or red.

Whats your parameters for 'timely fashion'?

Looks like those who got over excited a few days ago thinking the FDA was 'any minute' now making a Friday exit.

SmTch73, your lack of numeracy skills scares me.

It won’t go anywhere near £1.30 as that would be an Mcap of £2.75bn

Although it would make me a nice £35m profit. So maybe yes let’s go for £1.30

‘People trying to drive the price down’

Not really, nobody here knows the companies timetable, especially as they need external consultants to do the work.

Smiler, what happens if the FDA is not ‘any minute’?

Barnetpeter, simply response to your post is no, the FDA will not hold up for years an ODD application, they are against the clock, they would just reject it outright if they didn't agree with it.

They cannot ask for more testing as that is not what FDA ODD is about, so thats not an issue full stop.

NFX will be treated as an open application as the moment the FDA receives a response their clock starts again and they have to respond.

If you're going to try and take apart the process, at least learn what the process is first.