Member Info for Soupdragon78

"Do you think my statement that all of these warrant holders are connected to AMED is unreasonable ? " Without any evidence...Yes. Let's look at how realistic your claim is. You say AMED board loaned 30k to LEG in return for 250m warrants and to get Zaf a place on the board. So... 1) Zaf has always said that when Leg invests they seek a seat on the board of whichever company they invest in. He has been open about this. 2) the loan was in Aug 2010. 3) Leg bought into Creon (which eventually became Amedeo) in 2013 4) inbetween the 30k loan and the investment in Creon LEG raised a further £675k 5) inbetween the loan money coming in and investing in Creon, Leg invested in Bosques, Raw Games, Terra Energy and Medford Resources. 6) to invest in Creon cost £50k and 68m shares. So, can you say without doubt that the 30k was solely for the Creon investment? If you can prove me wrong then I'll accept it. But if you are willing to make such statements, you have to have evidence to back them up.

I'm more than happy to talk about deficiencies in LEG and the way they operate, but all you are giving me are unfounded allegations which you fail to substantiate. If you back up your allegations with evidence then I will accept your view, the problem is that you refuse to do so. Am I being unreasonable to ask for evidence that the warrant holders are Amedeo board members?

"warrant holders are all connected to AMED" Again, post your evidence, then I'll comment.

Again you're caught posting lies. "Because LEG only has 25k worth of AMED shares on the book. And guess how much cash we paid for them ? Thays right 25k. The rest. Is favours for mates to get him on the board no doubt with a nice 60k year salary." Ermmm.. No, Leg paid £50k and 68m shares for them. "Consideration for these shares comprised GBP50,000 in cash and 68,181,818 Legendary ordinary shares of nominal value 0.1p each ("Ordinary Shares")."

"what do you make of the FACT that all warrant holders are, or have been, affiliated with AMED?" Evidence please.

"We already know why the warrants were issued...." Everyone knew when they bought in except you. What does that tell you?

Yeah, its such a cunning plan. Get a loan for 30k in 2010, then wait till 2013 before putting it back into Creon. You'll have to try harder, then again if you want a defamation suit on your hands then keep going.

Sorry Superlucky but your bitterness is entirely based on the fact that you didn't take your substantial profits when you could have done. You said you had 24m shares in LEG all bought around 0.11p, yet somehow you managed not to sell despite the share price being more than double your purchase price for at least 6 months out of the past year. You try to pin blame on everything else except your own judgement since you know your greed got the better of you.

"Funny also, how other board members at AMED have ended up with a bucket load of our cash through having warrantsbased on a loan deal that had no interest or fixed term ?" And your evidence for this is what exactly? As your an MEP engineer you'll know about having your calcs, flow rates etc to evidence your design. Why do you insist on unfounded statements here?

If you've got evidence of insider dealing then take it to the authorities. As for warrants that were in public knowledge before you bought, but your own research didn't uncover for 4 years! (Thank god your not the MEP engineer on any of my projects if thats how tardy you are.)

All of LEG's other investments are not worth bothering with. as I've said many times over LEG is a one trick pony, its all in on VS. Never thought an RTO would be realistic LEG has too much baggage.

Can't figure out why LSE auto censors the words car and phone joined together.

"VS has had new contracts with the NHS, John Lewis, and Sainsbury's." Sorry RJB1, VS does not have a contract with Sainsbury's, it has a contract with Sainsburys Argos. Also you can add Dixons ****hone and B&Q to your list.

"I wish i cashed out on the one single day in may 2016 " Obviously not a man of your word. Back in Dec 2015 you said. "'l'll sell As soon as it gets to .18 and before zafar can dilute all the LTH" Your frustration is more with yourself I'm sensing.

Superlucky, why, when the leg shareprice was over 0.3p did you not raise your concerns with the CEO?

Superlucky, your post on 8th May tells me you didn't do your research before you bought in. Only yourself to blame. "RNS Does anyone know how many more shares we have out with warrants at 0.1p ? "

"In that these warrants were not actually needed by the company" But that was before you bought in. So what were your thoughts at the time you bought in? If it bothered you so much why did you buy? I'm guessing I'm right in that you didn't research, since you've only started talking about warrants since I pointed them out a few months ago.

Plus you talk about being mad with rage, upset, unhappy. Classic projection in action. What you mean is that you are upset with yourself for not seeing that the warrants were there when you bought in. Especially as they have been known about since 2010. Cut the emotion out of your investing and you might get somewhere.

What is the deception with the warrants? You referred to one, so say exactly what it is. Zaf has always been open about his ideology, he's sat in front of an audience and said he actively seeks to take a seat on the board of companies LEG invests in. "we invested as LEG but somehow our CEO holds a comparable amount of shares in VS as LEGENDARY investments does." LEG owns 447,428 shares in VS and Zaf owns 169,433 Do you know how to count? Why do you feel the need to lie. You've been shown twice today to make up stats to try to suit your purpose.

You've still not answered the question. What is the deception you were talking about?