Member Info for sol001

A company that makes 32 billion doesn't write a non binding letter just to spike the sp for George. I think a company like that has definitely done their research before allowing this to be released in an rns. This will definitely go through

Once the rns drops of the binding contract signed off; this will rocket 🚀 Glencore is huge with a market cap of 32 billion. George has definitely pulled it out of the bag with this one

What they really need to do, is have an interview that goes alongside the rns like they used to do with pj. I thought it was really useful having the stockbox with Jack Dann 5 months ago. They need a bit more of these to explain things better and excite new and existing shareholders to invest more

Nice to hear an interview with Sean even though most of it I've heard before. But good for new investors. I hope what he said about drilling next month (may) goes ahead and they do keep us informed regularly on their progress. I think a positive rns that they have found something while drilling will give us the boost we need

Must of been a glitch; just came through now

Is there any reason why the RNS aren't coming through here today? Thanks for posting this ICB888

As a shareholder in pow of course I'm interested in the sp. We don't have dividends and Sean isn't bothered about the sp because he gets paid his salary at the end of the day. We get news flow here (rns) on the Uranium project so any good news will help push up our sp. Very different to the ipos. Gmet has had their own news flow and this has pushed up their sp, but has done nothing for the sp here. Which would you prefer? A JV that could lead to a movement in the sp or an ipo that doesn't do anything but pays for more ipos and bonuses for Sean. As I mentioned below it's been nearly 2 years since gmet went live. Tell me when we will benefit as shareholders?

Tray I will eat my words if this flies here, but if it doesn't I will be coming back to you as you've been saying this for a while now

So the Uranium jv that we have a stake in. Which if not under pow sp is this under? A separate ipo we don't know about?

When will the sp catch up to gmet as Sean promised. His words that pow shareholders get the benefit without all the dilution. Our sp has dropped since they went live and theirs has risen. So where is our rise from the ipos

Your saying that when the Saudi Arabia becomes an ipo similar to gmet, our sp will rise differently to them? Let's wait and see shall we Tray. Because we've heard it for nearly 2 years now

10th May 23 to current date. Average 12-15p since gmet went live. After this we have £7 million and nothing to show for it as investors. I maybe looking at the negative side, but I'm a long-term shareholder like some others here and would like to see some movement here. Put molopo as an ipo, we don't care so much about this; just keep the Saudi projects under pow

"Then there’s multiple deals signed in Saudi Arabia and an IPO to come from that quarter."

Has this been officially approved for an ipo and when is this for? FDR I know this has been delayed and no official date yet.

I still believe they should keep the Saudi projects under pow like the Uranium jv. The money from gmet is going towards the Saudi project. I'd be pretty unhappy if this went separate and drove investors away from pow. We all know what happened with gmet and we still haven't seen any benefits as promised from this. I know Tray will chuck some figures around, but we can see the sp from historical figures hasn't reacted to gmet

If some of the clueless investors as you call them sold, I'm sure the sp wouldn't go upto 27p. We need investors for that and even with all these figures, this won't happen without some major news

I've mentioned this a few times in the past. I agree with the move Sean made on the gmet sale and part of this will go on the Saudi project. I just feel for such a small company we have too many shares in issue. Before consolidation it was over 2 billion shares. Sean has mentioned and pj also mentioned in the past that Shareholders would see a return. Perhaps a buyback at some point might be possible. It's what lots of other companies are doing at the moment. Otherwise if Sean is talking to other major investors in Saudi or friends or RR; he should encourage them to buy on market. Imagine if RR had done that; it definitely wouldn't of been 17p. As you said we are debt free and they don't need the cash. We still have a partial amount left in gmet, we have the jv with ucam which they won't need to raise cash through new shares and GSAe should at some point bring in a regular cash flow. My point is when do we as investors see a return for our long term holding

I forgot Sean consolidated our sp. So previously we had over 2 billion. 1 billion less than tesla. Or if tesla consolidated their shares, they would have 75,000,000 more than us. Crazy 🤪

I still believe we have too many shares in issue and Sean should of got RR to buy on market. I still dont know what they have done with the cash from issuing new shares to him. I've seen other huge companies in the ftse 250 who have less shares than us. Perhaps Sean should look into investors buying on market in the future instead of giving away new shares

Even though gmet has done well, they still haven't seen alot of investors (more than us though) but we are very low numbers compared to other mining companies out there. Some in terrible debt, but still seeing more numbers buying. I think the attraction is the sp moving. We have hardly moved in a long time and that's probably one reason why we have little interest. I'm here long term and we only need one discovery to boost us up and they will all start flocking over to buy pow

The way the market is at the moment, nobody can do anything, unless Trump reverses his decision on the tariffs. The sp hasn't really moved much since pj stepped down. The only thing that can lift us to higher numbers is a positive rns from drilling in the Athabasca or one of our other projects. Hopefully they get the website up and running and give investors some regular on site updates. So far we know drilling is coming in the next couple of months, but that's about it.

Toxicbull. It's definitely not for the lack of cash. If you look at Tray's post he breaks it down well. It's also not for the lack of projects we have. We have the Uranium projects, molopo farms, GSAe and the Saudi projects. I think we could do with more news and marketing to get the word out. We haven't had an interview with Sean in ages. We also could do with the Fermi exploration website up and running. Still says website coming soon.

when will they start the exploration in uranium?

Check out the last rns

Diamond drilling programme planned to test high-priority Iron Oxide Copper Gold ("IOCG") deposit style target.

 o  Planned 8 hole drilling programme, totalling a planned total 2,400m currently scheduled to commence during June 2025.

If pow get at least one discovery from the Uranium projects we have, we have potential to end up like Nextgen energy who went from $38.8 million to $5 billion or Isoenergy that went from $35 million to $717 million.

Ucam have given us the most amount then any other company has received for work in the Athabasca and its possible they will offer more to make sure a discovery is made.

The sp is low now, but if this was to happen in the near future, you will never see this price again

One thing we are lacking is people buying here. Compared to other companies, who most are in worst positions financially. Currently at nearly 3pm and we have 12 trades. That's one thing we are missing. Hopefully if we have positive news from the Athabasca and Saudi projects with drilling, we may have more 🙏

Exactly what I was thinking Doc. The market is really bad. Trump has made a complete balls up. People always vote for chaos; look at Labour at the moment as well