Member Info for smokeyjohnson108

So yesterday ria was posting about once every 6 mins or so. Today this has dropped significantly once the 3p barrier had been broken briefly. Expect to see an exponential slow down in the posts.

I'll be happy when we know what's behind this. Historically it doesn't end well for PIs. One for the notebook if it does or doesn't.

You better keep this level of commitment into next week otherwise people will smell something fishy!

Will we see you tomorrow ria or will you be out of here?

It's probably in auction... it's not that there aren't any available. Try after the auction.

Instead of just blindly buying to get it to 2.00, some people might be looking at the current market cap and debt and wondering whether, without news, the market cap is toppy as it is?

This probably shouldn't be on SETS anymore. It was put on SETS a few years ago so Lanstead and co could milk it... IMO

...On the SETS platform

So now we've had an A trade (15k @ 1.30p) the change % has changed. Quite often used just to F about with the price on low liquidity, high spread PI focused shares.

No A trades so far today

In amongst some of the greats. DVRG and SYME Sigh

Until the spread drops it has very little meaning. Since it's based on A trades, One A trade on the bid or the offer will change that completely. It could go from +11% to 0% in a single trade.

It's a bit meaningless in a share with a huge spread on SETS. An A trade could turn the gain/loss around entirely in one go.

Ria doing some overtime here! Get yourself a few more usernames ria otherwise it's just a bit strange, the same person posting bullish one liners all the time.

Nice first post Be-dud

Yes you're right, however when things become more of a binary outcome then it's even more of a gamble. This feels like a binary outcome at the moment.

Your "opportunity" argument is based on speculation and ramping. I was merely pointing out the facts of your mistake. At the moment, in the current environment a company's cash reserves is extremely important and you overstating the placing amount by 60% could lose people money if for example the company runs out of cash a few months earlier than people expect based on your original point.

There is an upside opportunity no doubt but pure gambling at this stage.

So you're saying £1m of cash doesn't matter in a company with a £10m market cap? I think you'll find it's a good few months worth of overheads. So you definitely need to proof read before you post in the future.

At this difficult point for the company facts are needed not ramping.

The placing was for £1.85m before costs not the £3m you quote. Here's the RNS.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/VRS/placing-to-raise-163185-million-6r5sbg77enm41tn.html

Why get the placing price 100% correct and then get the amount wrong by over 60%. You're as bad as the derampers that spread half truths.

You do spout some rubbish tech guru. We all want the company to be able to raise money and continue on but just feeding punters rubbish is not the right way.