Member Info for smickster

Dbw of course they won't.
It's my understanding that for a hostile bid to succeed any bidder would need 70% and more likely 90% to succeed so I'm not sure where 53% comes from.
Either I'm missing something or that's just plain nonsense.
I'm happy to learn something new today :-)

Keep it going.
People moving back in. 8m traded.

Add Is this right?

And this is where your diverse book fails. If either of BHP or NCM launch a bid, and the only circumstances I can see that happening is if the board rejects and approach from them, they only have to win 50.99 % to take control of the company.

As i understand they would need at least 70% to be successful which would mean 57% required.
If 57% is required they would indeed struggle at the moment and probably the reason bo cheeky 50p offer has been made.

Nice article Dbw.

Announced Lasso in the run off on Friday.
May of had something to do with the rally?

Zoros it almost sounds as if you are concerned for me.
You needn't worry as I will be fine so please feel free to leave and I will turn the lights out at about £3.

Rcgl your right matey but just think what prices will be like by the end of year??
Copper 4-5k
Gold 2+k

That's a nice message and and very hard to disagree with much of what you write.
I take offence because a certain few seem to take pleasure in spouting negative news and I don't believe for one second its about researching all news.
I'm not telling you to stop posting by all means crack on but I will point out(if I can) if its old, incorrect , fake news or just plain old fear mongering ;-)
I did have you on my filter bin for the good while until I saw some content of yoirs while you were stirring up ****e on cgp.sedar board and felt it was worth while checking out some of your posts. I guess that can be seen as a compliment. Gla

Zoros that's cobblers and you know it.
Nothing to do with my emotions I'm in solg for the long haul( yes production and another 10 years if need be) and prepared to take my losses on the chin however i don't plan on that being the case.
If your not prepared to accept me calling your nonsense out then maybe its yourself who needs a little time away from the chat room:-)
As I said old news no new meat.

May I add what you say is spot on.

Lunch money,
Cuenca is fed by multiple rivers and they are rightly protecting the water sources from mining.
It's also Yaku Perez home so he has a big following there and probably used this to garner support in the election.
I doubt solg would try to move on this area for these very reasons as they are trying to enhance their reputation not damage it.

True add but it's the same old bunch tossing about negative vibes and trying to mislead others.
I'm well aware of the risk and what's going on in Ecuador.
Like I pointed out this happened last week and is not new news yet a handful of posters bring it up every other day.
Why dont you all buy in and stop the bhp dirty work:-)

Exactly Tos.
The vote was last Sunday not today's news.
The vote cannot affect concessions already granted.

Really Red, that vote was last week?

And also very misleading as Cuenca does not cover the whole of southern Ecuador and definitely not affecting any of our projects.

That could well increase after pfs crewtime

Hole 7 mega grades coming.

This should read at fair value too which would be circa £3 if in production.
That might pull in a few value.

Redknight there was no vote for mining button?

https://mobile.twitter.com/i/status/1362398995075768321?cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjcw%3D%3D&refsrc=email