Member Info for smickster

Bnc I'm guessing what they are doing is all above board otherwise it to obvious.
I'm guessing it's some flaw that allows them to trade like this and as others have said keep a lid/range on this.
Possibly to flush out an early bid and close their position?
Who knows I'm no expert hence the questions.
Not sure why Quady gets so defensive about it as the evidence he requires is the trades they make and it does seem to have an affect on the sp as we have seen in the last 8 months.
I'm not buying that they are just shifting between funds....sorry mate I'm not.

Solg must be aware and that's why I feel there is nowt they can do and just par for the course.

Anyway I will let you guys discuss if this is a conspiracy theory or not while I research the new super coivd pill for the fake virus :-)

Thanks Lunch just checked and was reading incorrectly.
Can see now the notifications going above 5%.

From the other notifications.
Not always the same but usually circa 0.5%

https://www.griproom.com/fun/blackrock-is-trying-to-steal-gaslog-and-why-you-should-care

10 times in the last 8 months.

Quady why no notification going above 5% and why only in the last 18 months?

Lunch I think he means the 0.41 they are selling not overall stake.

I must be missing something here but each time they notify its under 5% does that mean they are not notifying when they go back above 5%?
Or are they declaring under 5% when they have already done it and essentially not required?

Yes it will be ;-)

I must say Darryl is doing a sterling job.
Definitely voting to keep him now.

Also Darryl would of known the situation and added some sort of clause/payoff should solg be bought out or he would keep his role should Bhp take the reigns?

Red, I think 1,2 and 3 are plausible tbf.

Rich

Let's hope so, although I'm not sure releasing news into this jittery market would be best for sp?

With the fed tapering bond purchases and the dollar gaining strength could this allow assets to be bought cheaper and be a driver for M&A?

I already asked the question for which you answered " wait and see"
It may not clear the way but I don't see the point in weakening a position of people who I believe will get the best result for me( even if it is only to serve themselves).
A bit like Ronaldo wanting to be topscorer and winning balon d'or but good ole Fred getting a league title under his belt.

Ref another words by thinking of himself it becomes our best chance of a higher bid.
I'd rather not clear the way for Bhp thanks.

Red

By Nm looking after himself he looks after smaller shareholders?
Is there another way?
Genuine question.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/amp/news/967602

Quady I'm truly sorry about this as I'm sure a man of your intelligence and standing has no comparisons.
I think deep down Red is missing your banter and has probably unfiltered you like he did Zoros.

Zoros by your own admission Mather is not yet out of the game bit early to be writing out his gravestone isn't it?