Actually it shows correct on the notice Notice of the Annual General Meeting (https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/6703H_1-2024-3-20.pdf) so it might not be their fault & could be a typo by whoever added the RNS to LSE
Anyone else notice that the date they've put on the RNS is wrong as it shows as 2025? Why can't they get the simple things correct?
"Notice of Annual General Meeting
Premier African Minerals Limited ("Premier" or the "Company"), announces that the 2024 Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of the Company will be held at the Croft, 87 Main Road, Blue Hills 1685, Midrand, South Africa at 13:00 (BST) on 8 April 2025."
Well the share price hasn't immediately nose-dived after the interview so that's better than normal for George. (Although investors might be on lunch and haven't watched it yet).
I think it seemed ok and confirmed production of SC6 and that a lot of the remaining issues are minor "tweaks" rather than major re-designs, and he's hopeful to hit the March delivery.
I think you're missing these important points from the RNS:
Issues with pH measurement and automatic reagent dosing are resolved to the extent necessary to ensure plant
operations.
The plant is operational, and Premier will focus on achieving the design throughput and standards with the assistance
as needed of the various OEMs.
Recently produced concentrates are adversely affected by the pH issues, however spodumene concentrate floated in
the main plant on 12 March is now at SC6 grade.
Granted it doesn't state how much SC6 PREM are now producing, and it does mean further modifications are needed to get to full throughput, but overall I thought it was a relatively positive RNS
In terms of quality of interview this was (surprisingly) a good one from George. He's saying that Prem are a few weeks away from producing high quality Spodumene and everything is on-track.... Personally I'd prefer to take a slightly more pragmatic stance on it and expect it to be 2-3 months away from proper production, but if (and that's a big "if") we hit SC6+ consistently then Prem should be one of the few lithium producers who are still viable at the current prices (most people aren't factoring in the part in the profit share with Canmax). I'm not a GR 'fan boy' and I think he's not always been transparent and helpful for shareholders, but I do like his current optimism and positive stance that production isn't too far away.
Would like to hear Acker's stance on this as he's one of the few long-term h
No I think he should remain as CEO as he does have a lot of useful mining knowledge (e.g. Finding & negotiating for Zulu in the 1st place). However I strongly believe we need a competent Finance Officer, and possibly a decent PR officer adding to the management structure as GR does seem a liability at those.
Overall I think the plan might turn out for the best, but my main worry is that we don't really know much about the company we're doing business with (KME) - There's nothing relevant coming up on a Google search, so for all we know it could just be George, Lenigas & Dattels with 3 shovels and a rusty old Ford F100 which they've valued at $4m. Hopefully things will become clearer on Friday's webinar.
It's been a good couple of days for PREM & it's nice to see the bulletin board with a more friendly atmosphere.
I'm just wondering what people's thoughts would be if the expected "Joint Venture" actually turns out to be an offer from one of the big players to buy PREM in it's entirety at a price of around 1p per share?
It's just a thought that's cropped up in my head, and isn't based on any info/prior knowledge, but just thought it could be an interesting discussion.