RE: Are those contingent payments a 1.25%, a 2.5% or a 10%?6 Apr 2021 20:19
Would have been about 9.7%.
Don't forget, that transaction also had CGT of c. $180-200m+
So here's the maths for you:
Sale: $900m for 21.57%
CGT: $180-200m+
Total proceeds: c. $700m for 21.57%
Tullow would have retained c. 9.7% stake.
Cost to develop 9.7% stake: $1260m
For ease of calculation, let's assume that Tullow sold entire stake back in 2017:
Sale: Approx. $1390m pro-rata basis
CGT: c. $300m
Total proceeds: $1090m
2020 sale:
Sale: $575m
CGT: $0 on sale and $0 on future contingent payments
Contingent payments on 28.3% stake: 1.25% if oil above $62, 2.5% if oil above $70
The production license is for approx. 23 years and the development was for 257m barrels (Tullows stake of 28.3%).
Of which, the risked recoverable estimate was 128.9m barrels (2C).
Depending on how much of the resource is developed into reserves, oil price, and depending on whether production license is to be extended, Tullow should be able to receive between $300-400m+ as contingent payments.
Yes, it's probably like $100-150m less than 2017 deal, but there was no requirement for Tullow to finance $1260m to develop 9.7% stake. Let's also not forget about the CAPEX reimbursement and other small benefits to Tullow from the 2020 deal.