Member Info for SL100

Evidence!!!! Where’s your evidence?

CAUTION!

Clear example of vested interests here. CAUTION.

Apologies for some spelling- checker !!!

Noise- I agree behaviour seems strange. But we are going on here say by a few posters here. It’s not available to all through public available info RNS etc.

Therefore it has to be treated with CAUTION.

There are quite a few anti VAL posters here so there would be firm so to speak. Not. Dating aspersions on anybody in particular but I will wait for official announcements.

Recent RNS have been positive- money is tight but they are not in Administration as I see it.

I’ve sen no announcement to that effect and I don’t think anybody else has either!

Good question PAD004- maybe because no official announcement to that effect- speculation. By some posters here. Are they trustworthy? Make your own mind up- without evidence it’s just ‘ chat room gossip!

Hard to Handke- agree if true. But where’s the evidence?

What administrators? They would have to be appointed in an intervention capacity by creditors etc applying to relevant authorities. WHERES THE EVIDENCE???

Information being disseminated NOT IN PUBLIC DOMAIN- therefore SUSPECT MOTIVES!!

How could they be out of funds?

PLACING OF £200K ONLY 3 WEEKS AGO?

ADMINISTRATION? Why? How?

Any of you who have seen these emails- other than TH and Roses care to post their views....

Could we get postings here of the main email- without prejudice to all concerned. For information Purposes only?

This might be no more than a director with a big ego- claiming the bulk of credit for invention and mouthing off... who knows.

Always tensions at BOD level

No advice intended- but based on current market cap and potential- while risky. Multiply by 10 is not beyond possibility.

0.0012....0.012! Figures in £

That is going from 0.12p to 1.12p

Subsoil- give it a rest- annoying to hear know all’s - proof is in the pudding.... let’s see how it pans out!

Any chance ScottPalmer- you might give it a rest.

Reading this constant posting about Lummsunden is frying my brain and that of a few others I’m sure.

Thanks.

Yeh- what’s the point. Telling us something we dont know!! Daaaaahhhhhh.

Suk... All this theory is fine while sitting at a keyboard pontificating.

In reality investment on AIM is without doubt - high risk- potential high reward - but more likely very high and repeated losses.

Timing is everything- but how often do any of us get that right.

I feel that while you are taking a risk now- others have justifiably got grievance - you should have the decency to recognise the fact and show some respect accordingly.

You don’t have a monopoly on wisdom or anything for that matter.

Cdnoilsupporter- well expressed and with dignity.

Good stuff- broadly agree. I have contacted AH but not engaged in insulting comments. Also appreciate his difficulties like those of others.

Nonetheless he owes the shareholders. I think he must now deliver.

Wisha- I hope you’re right.

Maybe if events take a turn in terms of global problem with viruses etc- organisations like FDA may have to reduce their stringent requirements.

Needs must and all that....

Cons- you make some good points.

Communications from AH and the Company have not been great to say the least.

Also we have to be careful of posters- who post repeatedly- what’s their agenda. Sul.. take note!

Nobody minds posts but balanced posts and not too many. Hmmmm