Member Info for Skwizz

They'll need to.
There's only so much air to breathe.
And we're also using up the space that air generators need to survive.

I'm not anti-environmentalism.
I just think it's doomed to fail and thus is the human-race, unless we recognise and tackle the actual problem that it's part of.
It is essential for our species' survival but, I'm afraid that I just can't take environmentalism seriously on those grounds.
It's only one part of a much more urgent issue.
Without tackling that, environmentalism only prolongs the inevitable.

*using limited resources

I can't access it either (without subscribing) but yeah.
I keep saying this whole 'green' thing, while necessary and admirable, is pretty daft in the terms the soundbite generation want.
The birth rate is still outpacing the speed needed to convert away from fossils, even when they eventually run out.
And by then the resources required for a green transition will, themselves, be exhausted.
We will have also probably found a reason to transition away from those as well by then.

Fossil fuel is just a distraction from the real truth;
There are too many people, using limited, with nowhere else to move to.

The 15 year-old (probably 16 by now) irritating 'how-dare-you' schoolgirl needs to forget about her fossil-fuel school project and start focussing on restricting the global birth rate.
Or upon where her generation plan to re-locate to and how.
Otherwise the human race experiment will be over in four or five generations.
Maybe less.

The only positive side of that which I can see is that I won't be around to experience it.

"The UK needs to create a new motoring tax to plug the revenue gap as drivers switch to electric cars, MPs have said.
The government should tax motorists based on miles travelled as the use of petrol and diesel vehicles decreases, the Transport Select Committee said.
If no action is taken this year, the UK faces a £35bn "black hole" in its finances, they said."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-60251046

"Overall Average: 96% SELL"
https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quotes/UKOG.LN/opinion

Well, that's better than it has been.
But still...
:D

That'd just be taxing the economy.... the people.

https://www.fxempire.com/news/article/shell-q4-profits-smash-forecasts-lifted-by-oil-and-gas-prices-886498

"Shell said it expected to increase its dividend by 4% in the first quarter of 2022 to $0.25 per share. The company also announced it will buy back $8.5 billion worth of shares in the first half of 2022, including $5.5 billion from the sale of its Permian shale assets."

Veronya,
Can I be Head of Personnel?
I've always enjoyed firing people.
Can't understand it when people say they don't.
Obviously I have a target in mind.
Short-term contract; I'd retire again as soon as the job is complete.
I reckon about ten minutes should do it.
Ten minutes would be about ..,what? £50.00 worth of his remuneration.

Small world, NT.
I only just made a couple of posts on BP recently.
May have made some a few years ago, but other than that none.
Mostly only ever posted questions on shares I flipped.
Don't think I ever posted on anything I'm holding for long-term growth (other than BP, as I do adjust my holding in it occasionally too).
Imagine the response to posting a question about UKOG on here.
Lolololol

Congrat's Sageman.
Hoping for the best of returns for you in your future investment.
Good luck.
:)

Ditto.
Maybe you could go spear a monkey or something.
(Not a euphemism).

I'm not invested currently, but have been invested on over fifty different and separate occasions, btw.
And subsequently not.
;)

They're blithering idiots, bud.

I keep on and on and on trying to explain to their tiuny minds that people can be invested, or not invested but thinking about invested (out).
Either can be interested in the share and the latter is exactly the target of their rampings, trying to persuade people to buy.
But they just don't seem to get it.
That's the kind of mentality we are dealing with.

https://uk.sports.yahoo.com/news/oil-price-gushes-32-2-165824937.html

"For environmental, social and governance (ESG) investors, investing in fossil-fuel companies is problematic. But oil and gas will remain crucial to the global energy supply for several decades. Also, supply issues mean that oil might go even higher, despite being at seven-year highs. Brent Crude last exceeded $100 a barrel in October 2014. It also exploded to a record peak above $147 in July 2008. And when the oil price climbs, it boosts oil producers’ cash flow, profits, and earnings."

"Anyway. In the bin with you and your underhand pal."

FINALLY!
Thank gawd for that.
I urge all the other twerps to follow Stu's example.
If you don't like my posts, filter me.
Then, rather than posting more drivel like his, you won't have to read them i the first place and sound less idiotic by feeling you have to berate them.
Simple.
Thank you for your kind considerations.
:)

Stu, Cynderlad's answered you.

"Tranquillo, why does rice taste the way it does? Try to move on. If you are that bothered, then filter me.
I've given a reasonable answer. Enough said."

He's probably filtered you now.
You might want to find something more interesting to do yourself too.

I don't regard any of these twerps as 'bullies'.
Those called 'bullies' here seem to me to be the playground wimps upon whom the bullies pick.
There's a reason that bullies pick on them.
It's always the same reason.
They are the abnormal, weaker, more immature kids.

Please publish your calculations on why you think 16m is too low.
Include production; assets; costs and shares in issue.

It's not ibug that needs to get a life....

Admin already caught the new UserID.
Another day of wasted efforts for him.
;)